Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute and recurrent appendicitis: Retrospective analysis of a single-group 5-year experience

被引:11
作者
Fogli, L [1 ]
Brulatti, M [1 ]
Boschi, S [1 ]
Di Domenico, M [1 ]
Papa, V [1 ]
Patrizi, P [1 ]
Capizzi, FD [1 ]
机构
[1] Osped Bellaria, Div Chirurg Gen, I-40139 Bologna, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A | 2002年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1089/10926420252939619
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose: Twenty years after the first report of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), its role in the treatment of appendicitis is still under debate. We report herein a retrospective analysis of our cases of LA in the last 5 years, during which we adopted a policy of an almost uniform laparoscopic approach on a rather selected population composed mainly of women with acute or recurrent lower quadrant abdominal pain. Patients and Methods: Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed on 33 male and 98 female patients. The mean age at operation was 25.7 +/- 11.4 years (range 11-59 years). Acute appendicitis with localized or diffuse peritonitis was present in 34 cases. In the remaining 97 patients, the operation was performed for acute or recurring symptoms of lower quadrant abdominal pain. Results: There were no conversions to open surgery. The operating time was 45 +/- 17 minutes (range 30-110 minutes). The pathology examination of the removed appendices showed acute appendicitis in 34 cases and chronic inflammation in the remaining 97 patients. In one case, histology revealed a coexisting mucinous carcinoid that extended to the perivisceral fat, and a completion right hemicolectomy was performed. Complications were minor in most cases. Reoperation for deep abdominal abscess or hematoma was required in three cases. The mean hospital stay was 2.59 +/- 1.58 days (range 24 hours-11 days). Conclusion: In our hands, LA has proven to be safe and effective. The laparoscopic operation has significant advantages in terms of lower invasiveness and better diagnostic capability. It is especially useful in women of child-bearing age, in whom it may be considered the procedure of choice.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 110
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Agresta F, 2000, Chir Ital, V52, P171
  • [2] A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy
    Chung, RS
    Rowland, DY
    Li, P
    Diaz, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) : 250 - 256
  • [3] Efficacy of routine laparoscopy for the acute abdomen
    Chung, RS
    Diaz, JJ
    Chari, V
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (03): : 219 - 222
  • [4] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Time to decide
    Fingerhut, A
    Millat, B
    Borrie, F
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 23 (08) : 835 - 845
  • [5] Grandjean JP, 1999, ANN CHIR, V53, P280
  • [6] Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy
    Hellberg, A
    Rudberg, C
    Kullman, E
    Enochsson, L
    Fenyö, G
    Graffner, H
    Hallerbäck, B
    Johansson, B
    Anderberg, B
    Wenner, J
    Ringqvist, I
    Sörensen, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [7] Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable
    Kraemer, M
    Ohmann, C
    Leppert, R
    Yang, Q
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (07): : 625 - 633
  • [8] Laparoscopic interval appendectomy for periappendicular abscess
    Lidar, Z
    Kuriansky, J
    Rosin, D
    Shabtai, M
    Ayalon, A
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (08): : 764 - 766
  • [9] MATTEI P, 1994, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V178, P385
  • [10] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
    Merhoff, AM
    Merhoff, GC
    Franklin, ME
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (05) : 375 - 378