A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the characteristics of gout patient education resources

被引:41
作者
Robinson, Philip C. [1 ,4 ]
Schumacher, H. Ralph, Jr. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] VA Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Queensland, Diamantina Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Comprehension; Gout; Health literacy; Patient education; Readability; FUNCTIONAL HEALTH LITERACY; CARE; ADHERENCE; DISEASE; COMMUNICATION; COMPREHENSION; READABILITY; INSTRUMENT; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10067-013-2168-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Patient education is an important aspect of gout management, but there is evidence that many patients lack adequate knowledge of their condition. Our aim was to examine the characteristics of gout patient education resources. Ten gout patient information resources were examined for readability (Flesch-Kincaid reading level, the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook measure and the Flesch Reading Ease Score), qualitative characteristics such as figure and jargon use and whether they included information on the major points of gout. The median readability grade level of the examined resources was 8.5. The difference in readability grade level between the highest and the lowest education resource was 6.3 grade levels. The information content of the resources was high with an average of only 3.9 proposed criteria of 19 (19 %) absent from the resources. Jargon use was low and concepts were usually explained. However, important information regarding acute flare prophylaxis during urate-lowering therapy initiation and titration and treating serum uric acid to target was absent from 60 % of the patient education resources. There was poor use of key messages at the start. Gout patient resources have a wide range of readability. Thirty percent of resources were above the average reading level of rheumatology outpatients reported in previous studies. Sixty percent of gout patient resources omit education items that could impact on patient adherence and in turn patient outcomes. Further research is needed into the literacy levels and education requirements of patients with gout.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 778
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]
American College of Rheumatology, 2011, GOUT
[2]
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2011, THINGS YOU SHOULD KN
[3]
[Anonymous], 2004, The Principles of Readability
[4]
Asthma numeracy skill and health literacy [J].
Apter, Andrea J. ;
Cheng, Jing ;
Small, Dylan ;
Bennett, Ian M. ;
Albert, Claire ;
Fein, Daniel G. ;
George, Maureen ;
Van Horne, Simone .
JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2006, 43 (09) :705-710
[5]
Australian Rheumatology Association, 2011, GOUT
[6]
The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services [J].
Baker, DW ;
Parker, RM ;
Williams, MV ;
Clark, WS ;
Nurss, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (06) :1027-1030
[7]
We can make gout management more successful now [J].
Becker, Michael A. ;
Chohan, Saima .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2008, 20 (02) :167-172
[8]
DESIGNING AND EVALUATING PRINTED EDUCATION MATERIALS - MODEL AND INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT [J].
BERNIER, MJ ;
YASKO, J .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1991, 18 (03) :253-263
[9]
Independent impact of gout on mortality and risk for coronary heart disease [J].
Choi, Hyon K. ;
Curhan, Gary .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (08) :894-900
[10]
Literacy and health outcomes - A systematic review of the literature [J].
DeWalt, DA ;
Berkman, ND ;
Sheridan, S ;
Lohr, KN ;
Pignone, MP .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (12) :1228-1239