Bricolage and growth in social entrepreneurship organisations

被引:70
作者
Bojica, A. M. [1 ]
Ruiz Jimenez, J. M. [1 ]
Ruiz Nava, J. A. [2 ]
Fuentes-Fuentes, M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Business Adm, Granada, Spain
[2] Tecnol Monterrey, Social Entrepreneurship, Monterrey, Mexico
关键词
Bricolage; TMT diversity; social entrepreneurship; organisational growth; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; FIRM PERFORMANCE; HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS; UPPER ECHELONS; DIVERSITY; DIFFERENCE; INNOVATIVENESS; EFFECTUATION; NATIONALITY;
D O I
10.1080/08985626.2017.1413768
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the role of bricolage in the growth of social entrepreneurship organisations (SEOs). Building on the premises that (1) bricolage is based on the resources at hand and the subjective perspectives that individuals have of these resources, and (2) the characteristics of the top management team (TMT) are an indicator of the resources they make available to the organisation and their ability to put different perspectives into play to interpret resource environments, we seek to determine which configurations of resource endowment, autonomy in the use of resources, TMT diversity and bricolage promote organisational growth. Using a fuzzy-set theoretical technique (fsQCA), we show that the effect of bricolage on organisational growth is contingent on the availability of resources, the degree of autonomy in using these resources and TMT diversity in organisational tenure. Our findings also indicate that TMT gender diversity is not a relevant condition to the growth of SEOs that use bricolage and that TMTs incorporating members with differing levels of previous experience in for-profit organisations exert a negative impact on organisational growth.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 389
页数:28
相关论文
共 94 条
[81]  
Senyard J., 2014, AUSTR CTR ENTR RES E, P1024
[82]   Bricolage as a Path to Innovativeness for Resource-Constrained New Firms [J].
Senyard, Julienne ;
Baker, Ted ;
Steffens, Paul ;
Davidsson, Per .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (02) :211-230
[83]   Diversity in organizations: Where are we now and where are we going? [J].
Shore, Lynn M. ;
Chung-Herrera, Beth G. ;
Dean, Michelle A. ;
Ehrhart, Karen Holcombe ;
Jung, Don I. ;
Randel, Amy E. ;
Singh, Gangaram .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2009, 19 (02) :117-133
[84]   The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance [J].
Siciliano, JI .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1996, 15 (12) :1313-1320
[85]   Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams [J].
Simons, T ;
Pelled, LH ;
Smith, KA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (06) :662-673
[86]  
Steffens P., 2009, FRONTIERS ENTREPRENE, P1
[87]   How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields [J].
Talke, Katrin ;
Salomo, Soren ;
Rost, Katja .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (07) :907-918
[88]   Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass [J].
Torchia, Mariateresa ;
Calabro, Andrea ;
Huse, Morten .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 102 (02) :299-317
[89]   Resource mobilization in entrepreneurial firms [J].
Villanueva, Jaume ;
Van de Ven, Andrew H. ;
Sapienza, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2012, 27 (01) :19-30
[90]   A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM [J].
WERNERFELT, B .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1984, 5 (02) :171-180