Categorising the severity of neck pain: Establishment of cut-points for use in clinical and epidemiological research

被引:99
作者
Fejer, R
Jordan, A
Hartvigsen, J
机构
[1] Univ So Denmark, Fac Hlth Sci, Inst Sports Sci & Clin Biomech, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
[2] Univ So Denmark, Inst Publ Hlth Epidemiol, Odense, Denmark
[3] Broadgate Spine Ctr, London, England
[4] Nord Inst Chiropract & Clin Biomech, Odense, Denmark
关键词
cut-points; neck pain; pain severity; numeric rating scales; gender; age;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.033
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Grading pain intensity scales into simple categories provides useful information for both clinicians and epidemiologists and methods to classify pain severity for numerical rating scales have been recommended. However, the establishment of cut-points is still in its infancy and little is known as to whether cut-points are affected by age or gender. The objectives of this paper were to establish optimal cut-points in pain severity in individuals with neck pain (NP) and to investigate if the cut-points were influenced by gender, age, and NP duration. Data from the population-based 'Funen Neck and Chest Pain Study' was used. Univariate and multivariate analyses of variance were performed to calculate optimal single and double cut-points for three different pain intensity scores within the past 2 weeks relative to two neck disability scales ('global assessment of NP' and the 'Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale'). The two disability scales showed small differences in optimal cut-points. Furthermore, cut-points changed for each of the three pain intensity scales. Only small gender differences in cut-points were seen and no specific trend was noted in either single or double cut-points in different age groups. The cut-points were almost identical for acute, subacute, and chronic NP. This paper has implications for understanding the impact of using different pain intensity scales and provides reference cut-points in NP for use in future clinical and epidemiological research. (c) 2005 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 182
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Role of cutpoints: why grade pain intensity? [J].
Anderson, KO .
PAIN, 2005, 113 (1-2) :5-6
[2]  
Clark WC, 2002, PAIN, V98, P241, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00474-2
[3]   STUDIES WITH PAIN RATING-SCALES [J].
DOWNIE, WW ;
LEATHAM, PA ;
RHIND, VM ;
WRIGHT, V ;
BRANCO, JA ;
ANDERSON, JA .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1978, 37 (04) :378-381
[4]  
FEJER R, UNPUB SCAND J PUB HL
[5]  
FEJER R, IN PRESS EUR SPINE J
[6]   Test-retest reliability of an upper-extremity discomfort questionnaire in an industrial population [J].
Franzblau, A ;
Salerno, DF ;
Armstrong, TJ ;
Werner, RA .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1997, 23 (04) :299-307
[7]   Age-related differences in the qualities but riot the intensity of chronic pain [J].
Gagliese, L ;
Melzack, R .
PAIN, 2003, 104 (03) :597-608
[8]   A review of age differences in the neurophysiology of nociception and the perceptual experience of pain [J].
Gibson, SJ ;
Farrell, F .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2004, 20 (04) :227-239
[9]   Pain intensity assessment in older adults - Use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults [J].
Herr, KA ;
Spratt, K ;
Mobily, PR ;
Richardson, G .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2004, 20 (04) :207-219
[10]   The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients [J].
Jensen, MP ;
Turner, LR ;
Turner, JA ;
Romano, JM .
PAIN, 1996, 67 (01) :35-40