EFFICACY OF A FITNESS CENTRE-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMME COMPARED WITH A HOME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMME IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

被引:41
作者
Hassett, Leanne M. [1 ,2 ]
Moseley, Anne M. [3 ]
Tate, Robyn L. [4 ]
Harmer, Alison R. [1 ]
Fairbairn, Timothy J. [5 ]
Leung, Joan [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Liverpool Hlth Serv, Brain Injury Rehabil, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, George Inst Int Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, No Clin Sch Med, Rehabil Studies Unit, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[5] Westmead Hosp, Brain Injury Rehabil Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Royal Rehabil Ctr Sydney, Brain Injury Rehabil Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
brain injuries; exercise; physical therapy (specialty); rehabilitation; physical fitness; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; AEROBIC CAPACITY; REHABILITATION; DEPRESSION; DISABILITIES; INDIVIDUALS; RELIABILITY; PREVENTION; RECOVERY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.2340/16501977-0316
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the effects of a supervised fitness centre-based exercise programme with an unsupervised home-based exercise programme on cardiorespiratory fitness and psychosocial functioning in people with traumatic brain injury. Design: Multi-centre, assessor-blinded, parallel group, randomized controlled trial. Participants: Sixty-two participants with severe traumatic brain injuries, who could walk at a speed exceeding 1 m/sec, discharged from 3 brain injury units. Interventions: The fitness centre group completed a combined fitness and strength training exercise programme supervised by a personal trainer in a local fitness centre 3 times per week for 12 weeks. The home group completed a similar exercise programme unsupervised at home. Main outcome measure: Cardiorespiratory fitness measured using the modified 20-m shuttle test. Results: Both groups improved in fitness: the maximal velocity achieved on the modified 20-m shuttle test increased with intervention and was maintained at follow-up. However, the difference between groups was not significant ( mean between-group difference (95% confidence interval) 0 m/sec (-0.6 to 0.6) at the end of intervention). There were also no between-group differences in psychosocial functioning at the end of intervention or at follow-up. Conclusion: Both interventions were equally effective at improving cardiorespiratory fitness in adults with traumatic brain injuries.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 255
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]   Depression, cognition, and functional correlates of recovery outcome after traumatic brain injury [J].
Satz, P ;
Forney, DL ;
Zaucha, K ;
Asarnow, RR ;
Light, R ;
McCleary, C ;
Levin, H ;
Kelly, D ;
Bergsneider, M ;
Hovda, D ;
Martin, N ;
Namerow, N ;
Becker, D .
BRAIN INJURY, 1998, 12 (07) :537-553
[32]  
SULLIVAN S J, 1990, Brain Injury, V4, P407, DOI 10.3109/02699059009026194
[33]   Measuring psychosocial recovery after traumatic brain injury: Psychometric properties of a new scale [J].
Tate, R ;
Hodgkinson, A ;
Veerabangsa, A ;
Maggiotto, S .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 1999, 14 (06) :543-557
[34]   Why does neurorehabilitation fail? [J].
van den Broek, MD .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2005, 20 (05) :464-473
[35]   Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data [J].
Vickers A.J. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 5 (1)
[36]   Reliability of a walk/run test to estimate aerobic capacity in a brain-injured population [J].
Vitale, AE ;
Jankowski, LW ;
Sullivan, SJ .
BRAIN INJURY, 1997, 11 (01) :67-76
[37]   THE HOSPITAL ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION SCALE [J].
ZIGMOND, AS ;
SNAITH, RP .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1983, 67 (06) :361-370