In vivo evaluation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic mucoadhesive semi-solid formulations containing sucralfate and lidocaine for intraoral use

被引:12
作者
Jacques, Y
NguyenXuan, T
Ionescu, E
Ravelli, GP
Buri, P
Baehni, P
Gurny, R
机构
[1] UNIV GENEVA,DEPT PHARMACEUT TECHNOL,SCH PHARM,CH-1211 GENEVA 4,SWITZERLAND
[2] ZYMA SA,PHARMACEUT DEV,CH-1260 NYON,SWITZERLAND
[3] ZYMA SA,CENT CLIN DEV,CH-1260 NYON,SWITZERLAND
[4] UNIV GENEVA,DEPT PREVENT DENT,SCH DENT MED,CH-1211 GENEVA 4,SWITZERLAND
[5] PHARMAPEPTIDES,F-74166 ARCHAMPS,FRANCE
关键词
aphtae; bioadhesion; buccal mucosa; gamma scintigraphy; in vivo evaluation; lidocaine; semi-solid formulations; sucralfate;
D O I
10.1016/S0939-6411(96)00011-2
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Two types of mucoadhesive semi-solid formulations (hydrophilic and hydrophobic) for the treatment of mucositises, stomatitises and aphtae were investigated in healthy human volunteers using a gamma scintigraphic technique. The investigations showed that the clearance of hydrophobic formulations follows zero order kinetics whereas the hydrophilic formulation follows a biphasic elimination pattern. All formulations showed an acceptable tolerance but the subjects' preference went clearly to the hydrophobic formulations. Hydrophobic formulations maintained their adhesive and cohesive properties throughout the test period, loosing less than 10% activity within the first hour, whereas about 50% of the mucoadhesive hydrophilic preparation was eliminated within the same time period. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 63
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   NOVEL CONCEPT FOR A MUCOSAL ADHESIVE OINTMENT [J].
BREMECKER, KD ;
STREMPEL, H ;
KLEIN, G .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1984, 73 (04) :548-552
[2]  
Chen J.L., 1970, ADHESION BIOL SYSTEM, P163, DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-469050-9.50015-6
[3]  
FUJIYAMA N, 1982, Yokohama Medical Bulletin, V33, P149
[4]   BIOADHESIVE INTRAORAL RELEASE SYSTEMS - DESIGN, TESTING AND ANALYSIS [J].
GURNY, R ;
MEYER, JM ;
PEPPAS, NA .
BIOMATERIALS, 1984, 5 (06) :336-340
[5]  
ISHIDA M, 1981, CHEM PHARM BULL, V29, P810
[6]  
ISHIDA M, 1983, CHEM PHARM BULL, V31, P1010
[7]  
Kamath K., 1988, Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology, VVolume 10, P133
[8]  
KUTSCHER A H, 1959, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, V12, P1080, DOI 10.1016/0030-4220(59)90316-0
[9]   EFFECTS OF THE MUCOADHESIVE POLYMER POLYCARBOPHIL ON THE INTESTINAL-ABSORPTION OF A PEPTIDE DRUG IN THE RAT [J].
LEHR, CM ;
BOUWSTRA, JA ;
KOK, W ;
DEBOER, AG ;
TUKKER, JJ ;
VERHOEF, JC ;
BREIMER, DD ;
JUNGINGER, HE .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 44 (05) :402-407
[10]   INVITRO EVALUATION OF MUCOADHESIVE PROPERTIES OF CHITOSAN AND SOME OTHER NATURAL POLYMERS [J].
LEHR, CM ;
BOUWSTRA, JA ;
SCHACHT, EH ;
JUNGINGER, HE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 1992, 78 (01) :43-48