Does CEO managerial ability matter? Evidence from corporate investment efficiency

被引:84
作者
Gan, Huiqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Manning Sch Business, Dept Accounting, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
关键词
Managerial ability; Corporate investment; Investment efficiency; Managerial incentives; Board monitoring; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; MANAGEMENT QUALITY; AGENCY COSTS; FIRM; OVERCONFIDENCE; REPUTATION; OWNERSHIP; ACQUISITIONS; INCENTIVES; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s11156-018-0737-2
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study investigates how higher ability CEOs behave differently from lower ability CEOs in making investment decisions and, particularly, whether CEO managerial ability contributes to improved investment efficiency. I show evidence that more able CEOs make more efficient investment decisions. Specifically, talented CEOs increase (decrease) capital expenditures, acquisition expenditures, and total investments when their firms operate in settings more prone to under-investment (over-investment). These results suggest that high managerial ability helps with overcoming the two sources of investment inefficiency: over- and under-investment. I also find that the positive impact of CEO managerial ability on investment efficiency generally persists across different levels of board monitoring, whereas it gets weaker as the CEOs are overly exposed to equity risk. Robustness tests of using alternative measures of CEO managerial ability and controlling for potential endogeneity issues generate consistent results. Overall, the findings suggest that higher managerial ability leads to more efficient investment decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1118
页数:34
相关论文
共 55 条
[21]   Do executive stock options induce excessive risk taking? [J].
Dong, Zhiyong ;
Wang, Cong ;
Xie, Fei .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2010, 34 (10) :2518-2529
[22]   Acquisitions, overconfident managers and self-attribution bias [J].
Doukas, John A. ;
Petmezas, Dimitris .
EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 13 (03) :531-577
[23]   CEO Overconfidence and International Merger and Acquisition Activity [J].
Ferris, Stephen P. ;
Jayaraman, Narayanan ;
Sabherwal, Sanjiv .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2013, 48 (01) :137-164
[24]   CHIEF EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION - A STUDY OF THE INTERSECTION OF MARKETS AND POLITICAL PROCESSES [J].
FINKELSTEIN, S ;
HAMBRICK, DC .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1989, 10 (02) :121-134
[25]   CEO reputation and earnings quality [J].
Francis, Jennifer ;
Huang, Allen H. ;
Rajgopal, Shivaram ;
Zang, Amy Y. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2008, 25 (01) :109-+
[26]   Management Forecast Quality and Capital Investment Decisions [J].
Goodman, Theodore H. ;
Neamtiu, Monica ;
Shroff, Nemit ;
White, Hal D. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2014, 89 (01) :331-365
[27]   Managerial attitudes and corporate actions [J].
Graham, John R. ;
Harvey, Campbell R. ;
Puri, Manju .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 109 (01) :103-121
[28]   UPPER ECHELONS - THE ORGANIZATION AS A REFLECTION OF ITS TOP MANAGERS [J].
HAMBRICK, DC ;
MASON, PA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1984, 9 (02) :193-206
[29]   Stock options and managerial incentives for risk taking: Evidence from FAS 123R [J].
Hayes, Rachel M. ;
Lemmon, Michael ;
Qiu, Mingming .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 105 (01) :174-190
[30]   THE EFFECTS OF BOARD COMPOSITION AND DIRECT INCENTIVES ON FIRM PERFORMANCE [J].
HERMALIN, BE ;
WEISBACH, MS .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1991, 20 (04) :101-112