Voice disorders in the general population: Prevalence, risk factors, and occupational impact

被引:524
作者
Roy, N
Merrill, RM
Gray, SD
Smith, EM
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Surg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Univ Utah, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Iowa, Coll Publ Hlth, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
voice disorders; prevalence; risks; occupational impact;
D O I
10.1097/01.mlg.0000179174.32345.41
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: Epidemiologic studies of the prevalence and risk factors of voice disorders in the general adult population are rare. The purpose of this investigation was to 1) determine the prevalence of voice disorders, 2) identify variables associated with increased risk of voice disorders, and 3) establish the functional impact of voice disorders on the general population. Study Design: Cross-sectional telephone survey. Methods: A random sample (n = 1,326) of adults in Iowa and Utah was interviewed using a questionnaire that addressed three areas related to voice disorders: prevalence, potential risk factors, and occupational consequences/effects. Results. The lifetime prevalence of a voice disorder was 29.9%, with 6.6% of participants reporting a current voice disorder. Stepwise logistic regression identified specific factors that uniquely contributed to increased odds of reporting a chronic voice disorder including sex (women), age (40-59 years), voice use patterns and demands, esophageal reflux, chemical exposures, and frequent cold/sinus infections. However, tobacco or alcohol use did not independently increase the odds of reporting of a chronic voice disorder. Voice disorders adversely impacted job performance and attendance, with 4.3% of participants indicating that their voice had limited or rendered them unable to do certain tasks in their current job. Furthermore, 7.2% of employed respondents reported that they were absent from work 1 or more days in the past year because of their voice, and 2% reported more than 4 days of voice-related absence. Conclusions: The results of this large epidemiologic study provide valuable information regarding the prevalence of voice disorders, factors that contribute to voice disorder vulnerability, and the functional impact of voice problems on the general population.
引用
收藏
页码:1988 / 1995
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1984, Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data
[2]  
FIENBERG SE, 1977, ANAL CROSS CLASSIFIE
[3]   ADULT VOICE SCREENING [J].
LAGUAITE, JK .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1972, 37 (02) :147-151
[4]  
MORELY DE, 1952, J SPEECH HEAR DISORD, V17, P25
[5]   Voice disorders in teachers and the general population: Effects on work performance, attendance, and future career choices [J].
Roy, N ;
Merrill, RM ;
Thibeault, S ;
Gray, SD ;
Smith, EM .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2004, 47 (03) :542-551
[6]   Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population [J].
Roy, N ;
Merrill, RM ;
Thibeault, S ;
Parsa, RA ;
Gray, SD ;
Elaine, S .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2004, 47 (02) :281-293
[7]  
Scheffe H., 1959, The analysis of variance
[8]   Frequency of voice problems among teachers and other occupations [J].
Smith, E ;
Lemke, J ;
Taylor, M ;
Kirchner, HL ;
Hoffman, H .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 1998, 12 (04) :480-488
[9]   Occupational risk factors associated with voice disorders among teachers [J].
Thibeault, SL ;
Merrill, RM ;
Roy, N ;
Gray, SD ;
Smith, EM .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (10) :786-792
[10]  
Titze I. R., 1994, PRINCIPLES VOICE PRO