Optimization of stereotactically-guided conformal treatment planning of sellar and parasellar tumors, based on normal brain dose volume histograms

被引:44
作者
Perks, JR
Jalali, R
Cosgrove, VP
Adams, EJ
Shepherd, SF
Warrington, AP
Brada, M
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Neurooncol Unit, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[3] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Acad Unit Radiotherapy & Oncol, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[4] Inst Canc Res, London SW3 6JB, England
[5] Inst Canc Res, Sutton, Surrey, England
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1999年 / 45卷 / 02期
关键词
stereotactic conformal radiotherapy; 3D treatment planning; dose volume histograms; sellar tumors;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00156-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the optimal treatment plan for stereotactically-guided conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) of sellar and parasellar lesions, with respect to sparing normal brain tissue, in the context of routine treatment delivery, based on dose volume histogram analysis. Methods and Materials: Computed tomography (CT) data sets for 8 patients with sellar- and parasellar-based tumors (6 pituitary adenomas and 2 meningiomas) have been used in this study. Treatment plans were prepared for 3-coplanar and 3-, 4-, 6-, and 30-noncoplanar-field arrangements to obtain 95% isodose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) for each plan. Conformal shaping was achieved by customized blocks generated with the beams eye view (BEV) facility. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were calculated for the normal brain (excluding the PTV), and comparisons made for normal tissue sparing for all treatment plans at greater than or equal to 80%, greater than or equal to 60%, and greater than or equal to 40% of the prescribed dose. Results: The mean volume of normal brain receiving greater than or equal to 80% and greater than or equal to 60% of the prescribed dose decreased by 22.3% (range 14.8-35.1%, standard deviation sigma = 7.5%) and 47.6% (range 25.8-69.1%, sigma = 13.2%), respectively, with a 4-field noncoplanar technique when compared with a conventional 3-field coplanar technique. Adding 2 further fields, from 4-noncoplanar to 6-noncoplanar fields reduced the mean normal brain volume receiving greater than or equal to 80% of the prescribed dose by a further 4.1% (range -6.5-11.8%, sigma = 6.4%), and the volume receiving greater than or equal to 60% by 3.3% (range -5.5-12.2%, sigma = 5.4%), neither of which were statistically significant. Each case must be considered individually however, as a wide range is seen in the volume spared when increasing the number of fields from 4 to 6. Comparing the 4- and 6-field noncoplanar techniques to a 30-field conformal field approach (simulating a dynamic are plan) revealed near-equivalent normal tissue sparing. Conclusion: Four to six widely spaced, fixed-conformal fields provide the optimum class solution for the treatment of sellar and parasellar lesions, both in terms of normal brain tissue sparing and providing a relatively straightforward patient setup. Increasing the number of fields did not result in further significant sparing, with no clear benefit from techniques approaching dynamic conformal radiotherapy in the cases examined. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 513
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, 50 ICRU
[2]   STATIC-FIELD CONFORMAL STEREOTAXIC RADIOSURGERY - PHYSICAL TECHNIQUES [J].
BOURLAND, JD ;
MCCOLLOUGH, KP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (02) :471-479
[3]   A comparison of three stereotactic radiotherapy techniques; arcs vs. noncoplanar fixed fields vs. intensity modulation [J].
Cardinale, RM ;
Benedict, SH ;
Wu, QW ;
Zwicker, RD ;
Gaballa, HE ;
Mohan, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02) :431-436
[4]   NEUROBEHAVIORAL SEQUELAE OF CRANIAL IRRADIATION IN ADULTS - A REVIEW OF RADIATION-INDUCED ENCEPHALOPATHY [J].
CROSSEN, JR ;
GARWOOD, D ;
GLATSTEIN, E ;
NEUWELT, EA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (03) :627-642
[5]   Brainstem tolerance to conformal radiotherapy of skull base tumors [J].
Debus, J ;
Hug, EB ;
Liebsch, NJ ;
OFarrel, D ;
Finkelstein, D ;
Efird, J ;
Munzenrider, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (05) :967-975
[6]  
DUFFNER PK, 1985, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V56, P2189, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19851101)56:9<2189::AID-CNCR2820560909>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-I
[8]   TOLERANCE OF NORMAL TISSUE TO THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION [J].
EMAMI, B ;
LYMAN, J ;
BROWN, A ;
COIA, L ;
GOITEIN, M ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE ;
SHANK, B ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
WESSON, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :109-122
[9]   RELOCATABLE FRAME FOR STEREOTAXIC EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY [J].
GILL, SS ;
THOMAS, DGT ;
WARRINGTON, AP ;
BRADA, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 20 (03) :599-603
[10]   A COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES FOR STEREOTAXIC RADIOTHERAPY BY LINEAR-ACCELERATOR BASED ON 3-DIMENSIONAL DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
GRAHAM, JD ;
NAHUM, AE ;
BRADA, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1991, 22 (01) :29-35