Shifting to ecological engineering in flood management: Introducing new uncertainties in the development of a Building with Nature pilot project

被引:36
作者
van den Hoek, R. E. [1 ]
Brugnach, M. [1 ]
Hoekstra, A. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Water Engn & Management, Fac Engn Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Uncertainty; Ambiguity; Water policy; Flood management; Building with Nature; Ecological engineering; WATER MANAGEMENT; RESILIENCE; RESOURCES; AMBIGUITY; SCIENCE; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2012.05.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Building with Nature (BwN) is an innovative approach in flood policy, which aims to use natural system dynamics and materials for the design and realization of flood management projects. However, as natural dynamics are inherently unpredictable, the use of BwN design principles requires a fundamentally different approach to uncertainty in flood management. In this paper, we identify and classify the key uncertainties in the development process of a specific project using BwN design principles: the Sand Engine. Our results indicate that uncertainty about the social implications of applying BwN design principles is more relevant for project development than uncertainty in the factual knowledge base of the natural system. Although uncertainty did not hamper project development in this specific case, the changes in project design evoked by the use of BwN principles do not seem to be followed by proper changes in the development process preceding the project's implementation: in the Sand Engine project's development process, uncertainty is evaluated rather similar as in the current flood management practices. We claim that new approaches towards dealing with uncertainty are needed, to successfully address the uncertainties typical to projects using BwN design principles. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 99
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]  
van Asselt M. B. A., 2000, THESIS
[42]   Uncertainty in integrated assessment modelling - From positivism to pluralism [J].
van Asselt, MBA ;
Rotmans, J .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2002, 54 (1-2) :75-105
[43]  
Van Dalfsen J.A., 2009, P EMSAGG C 2009 ROM
[44]   The transition in Dutch water management [J].
van der Brugge, Rutger ;
Rotmans, Jan ;
Loorbach, Derk .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2005, 5 (04) :164-176
[45]   Identification of major sources of uncertainty in current IWRM practice. Illustrated for the Rhine basin [J].
van der Keur, P. ;
Henriksen, H. J. ;
Refsgaard, J. C. ;
Brugnach, M. ;
Pahl-Wostl, C. ;
Dewulf, A. ;
Buiteveld, H. .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2008, 22 (11) :1677-1708
[46]   Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: Insights from the UPEM conference [J].
van der Sluijs, Jeroen P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (05) :590-598
[47]   Human domination of Earth's ecosystems [J].
Vitousek, PM ;
Mooney, HA ;
Lubchenco, J ;
Melillo, JM .
SCIENCE, 1997, 277 (5325) :494-499
[48]  
Vreugdenhil H, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
[49]  
Walker W.E., 2003, INTEGRATED ASSESSMEN, V4, P5, DOI DOI 10.1076/IAIJ.4.1.5.16466
[50]   Addressing deep uncertainty using adaptive policies: Introduction to section 2 [J].
Walker, Warren E. ;
Marchau, Vincent A. W. J. ;
Swanson, Darren .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2010, 77 (06) :917-923