Short-Term Usual Chiropractic Care for Spinal Pain A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:27
作者
Walker, Bruce F. [1 ]
Hebert, Jeff J. [2 ]
Stomski, Norman J. [1 ]
Losco, Barrett [1 ]
French, Simon D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Sch Hlth Profess, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Murdoch Univ, Sch Psychol & Exercise Sci, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[3] Queens Univ, Sch Rehabil Therapy, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
back pain; neck pain; effectiveness; chiropractic; manipulation; spinal; randomized controlled trial; clinical trial; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CLINICAL-PREDICTION RULE; NECK PAIN; MANIPULATIVE THERAPY; OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; SCALE;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000435032.73187.c7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design. Parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Objective. Establish the short-term effectiveness of chiropractic therapy for spinal pain compared with a sham intervention and explore the predictors of chiropractic treatment satisfaction. Summary of Background Data. Chiropractic treatment is widely used for spinal pain. However, a lack of sound evidence precludes conclusions about the effectiveness of chiropractic for spinal pain. Methods. Participants were adults experiencing spinal pain, randomized to receive 2 treatments of chiropractic or sham therapy. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. Primary outcomes at 2 weeks were pain intensity (0-10 scale) and function (0-40 Functional Rating Index). Secondary outcomes were global change, minimum acceptable outcome, and treatment satisfaction. Treatment effects were estimated with linear mixed models for the primary outcomes. We used logistic regression to identify differences in the secondary outcomes and explore for predictors of treatment satisfaction. Results. One hundred eighty three participants (chiropractic, n = 92; sham, n = 91) were recruited and included in the analyses. Participants receiving chiropractic therapy reported greater improvements in pain (mean difference, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.5 [0.1-0.9]), physical function (mean difference [95% CI] = 2.1 [0.3-4.0]), and were more likely to experience global improvement (48% vs. 24%, P = 0.01) and treatment satisfaction (78% vs. 56%, P < 0.01). There was no between-group difference in achieving a minimally acceptable outcome (34% sham vs. 29% chiropractic, P = 0.42). Awareness of treatment assignment and achieving minimally important improvement in pain intensity were associated with chiropractic treatment satisfaction. Conclusion. Short-term chiropractic treatment was superior to sham; however, treatment effects were not clinically important. Awareness of treatment assignment and clinically important reductions in pain were associated with chiropractic treatment satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:2071 / 2078
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]
Chapter 4 - European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain [J].
Airaksinen, O. ;
Brox, J. I. ;
Cedraschi, C. ;
Hildebrandt, J. ;
Klaber-Moffett, J. ;
Kovacs, F. ;
Mannion, A. F. ;
Reis, S. ;
Staal, J. B. ;
Ursin, H. ;
Zanoli, G. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (Suppl 2) :S192-S300
[2]
[Anonymous], 2009, LOW BACK PAIN EARL M
[3]
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[4]
Australian Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group, 2003, NATL LIBR AUST, V2003, P1
[5]
Assessment of blinding in clinical trials [J].
Bang, HJ ;
Ni, LY ;
Davis, CE .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2004, 25 (02) :143-156
[6]
Methods of blinding in reports of randomized controlled trials assessing pharmacologic treatments:: A systematic review [J].
Boutron, Isabelle ;
Estellat, Candice ;
Guittet, Lydia ;
Dechartres, Agnes ;
Sackett, David L. ;
Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn ;
Ravaud, Philippe .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2006, 3 (10) :1931-1939
[7]
Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion [J].
Carragee, Eugene J. ;
Cheng, Ivan .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (04) :313-320
[8]
Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain [J].
Childs, JD ;
Piva, SR ;
Fritz, JM .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) :1331-1334
[9]
A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study [J].
Childs, JD ;
Fritz, JM ;
Flynn, TW ;
Irrgang, JJ ;
Johnson, KK ;
Majkowski, GR ;
Delitto, A .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (12) :920-928
[10]
Psychometric properties of the functional rating index in patients with low back pain [J].
Childs, MJD ;
Piva, SR .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (10) :1008-1012