A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study

被引:573
作者
Childs, JD [1 ]
Fritz, JM
Flynn, TW
Irrgang, JJ
Johnson, KK
Majkowski, GR
Delitto, A
机构
[1] Lackland AFB, Wilford Hall Med Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Baylor Univ, USA, Grad Program Phys Therapy, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Hill AFB, Med Clin, Ogden, UT USA
[5] Luke AFB, Med Clin, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Conflicting evidence exists about the effectiveness of spinal manipulation. Objective: To validate a manipulation clinical prediction rule. Design: Multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Physical therapy clinics. Patients: 131 consecutive patients with low back pain, 18 to 60 years of age, who were referred to physical therapy. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive manipulation plus exercise or exercise alone by a physical therapist for 4 weeks. Measurements: Patients were examined according to the clinical prediction rule criteria (symptom duration, symptom location, fear-avoidance beliefs, lumbar mobility, and hip rotation range of motion). Disability and pain at 1 and 4 weeks and 6 months were assessed. Results: Outcome from spinal manipulation depends on a patient's status on the prediction rule. Treatment effects are greatest for the subgroup of patients who were positive on the rule (at least 4 of 5 criteria met); health care utilization among this subgroup was decreased at 6 months. Compared with patients who were negative on the rule and received exercise, the odds of a successful outcome among patients who were positive on the rule and received manipulation were 60.8 (95% CI, 5.2 to 704.7). The odds were 2.4 (CI, 0.83 to 6.9) among patients who were negative on the rule and received manipulation and 1.0 (CI, 0.28 to 3.6) among patients who were positive on the rule and received exercise. A patient who was positive on the rule and received manipulation has a 92% chance of a successful outcome, with an associated number needed to treat for benefit at 4 weeks of 1.9 (CI, 1.4 to 3.5). Limitations: The response rate for the 6-month follow-up resulted in inadequate power to detect statistically significant differences for some comparisons. Conclusions: The spinal manipulation clinical prediction rule can be used to improve decision making for patients with low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:920 / 928
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Albright J, 2001, PHYS THER, V81, P1641
[2]   Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain - A meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies [J].
Assendelft, WJJ ;
Morton, SC ;
Yu, EI ;
Suttorp, MJ ;
Shekelle, PG .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (11) :871-881
[3]  
BIGOS S, 1991, AHCPR PUBLICATION
[4]  
BINKLEY J, 1995, PHYS THER, V75, P786, DOI 10.1093/ptj/75.9.786
[5]   INTERRATER RELIABILITY OF LUMBAR ACCESSORY MOTION MOBILITY TESTING - RESPONSE [J].
BINKLEY, J ;
STRATFORD, PW ;
GILL, C .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1995, 75 (09) :794-795
[6]   A report from the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain - Reexamining priorities [J].
Borkan, JM ;
Koes, B ;
Reis, S ;
Cherkin, DC .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :1992-1996
[7]   Methodologic issues in low back pain research in primary care [J].
Bouter, LM ;
van Tulder, MW ;
Koes, BW .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :2014-2020
[8]   THE PAIN DRAWING AND WADDELL NONORGANIC PHYSICAL SIGNS IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
CHAN, CW ;
GOLDMAN, S ;
ILSTRUP, DM ;
KUNSELMAN, AR ;
ONEILL, PI .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (13) :1717-1722
[9]   A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain [J].
Cherkin, DC ;
Sherman, KJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
Shekelle, PG .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (11) :898-906
[10]   Clinical decision making in the identification of patients likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A traditional versus an evidence-based approach [J].
Childs, JD ;
Fritz, JM ;
Piva, SR ;
Erhard, RE .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2003, 33 (05) :259-272