A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study

被引:573
作者
Childs, JD [1 ]
Fritz, JM
Flynn, TW
Irrgang, JJ
Johnson, KK
Majkowski, GR
Delitto, A
机构
[1] Lackland AFB, Wilford Hall Med Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Baylor Univ, USA, Grad Program Phys Therapy, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Hill AFB, Med Clin, Ogden, UT USA
[5] Luke AFB, Med Clin, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Conflicting evidence exists about the effectiveness of spinal manipulation. Objective: To validate a manipulation clinical prediction rule. Design: Multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Physical therapy clinics. Patients: 131 consecutive patients with low back pain, 18 to 60 years of age, who were referred to physical therapy. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive manipulation plus exercise or exercise alone by a physical therapist for 4 weeks. Measurements: Patients were examined according to the clinical prediction rule criteria (symptom duration, symptom location, fear-avoidance beliefs, lumbar mobility, and hip rotation range of motion). Disability and pain at 1 and 4 weeks and 6 months were assessed. Results: Outcome from spinal manipulation depends on a patient's status on the prediction rule. Treatment effects are greatest for the subgroup of patients who were positive on the rule (at least 4 of 5 criteria met); health care utilization among this subgroup was decreased at 6 months. Compared with patients who were negative on the rule and received exercise, the odds of a successful outcome among patients who were positive on the rule and received manipulation were 60.8 (95% CI, 5.2 to 704.7). The odds were 2.4 (CI, 0.83 to 6.9) among patients who were negative on the rule and received manipulation and 1.0 (CI, 0.28 to 3.6) among patients who were positive on the rule and received exercise. A patient who was positive on the rule and received manipulation has a 92% chance of a successful outcome, with an associated number needed to treat for benefit at 4 weeks of 1.9 (CI, 1.4 to 3.5). Limitations: The response rate for the 6-month follow-up resulted in inadequate power to detect statistically significant differences for some comparisons. Conclusions: The spinal manipulation clinical prediction rule can be used to improve decision making for patients with low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:920 / 928
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[51]   Implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries [J].
Stiell, IG ;
Wells, GA ;
Hoag, RH ;
Sivilotti, MLA ;
Cacciotti, TF ;
Verbeek, PR ;
Greenway, KT ;
McDowell, I ;
Cwinn, AA ;
Greenberg, GH ;
Nichol, G ;
Michael, JA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (23) :2075-2079
[52]   The Canadian CT head rule study for patients with minor head injury: Rationale, objectives, and methodology for phase I (derivation) [J].
Stiell, IG ;
Lesiuk, H ;
Wells, GA ;
McKnight, RD ;
Brison, R ;
Clement, C ;
Eisenhauer, MA ;
Greenberg, GH ;
MacPhail, I ;
Reardon, M ;
Worthington, J ;
Verbeek, R ;
Rowe, B ;
Cass, D ;
Dreyer, J ;
Holroyd, B ;
Morrison, L ;
Schull, M ;
Laupacis, A .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 38 (02) :160-169
[53]   IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OTTAWA ANKLE RULES [J].
STIELL, IG ;
MCKNIGHT, RD ;
GREENBERG, GH ;
MCDOWELL, I ;
NAIR, RC ;
WELLS, GA ;
JOHNS, C ;
WORTHINGTON, JR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (11) :827-832
[54]   The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients [J].
Stiell, IG ;
Wells, GA ;
Vandemheen, KL ;
Clement, CM ;
Lesiuk, H ;
De Maio, VJ ;
Laupacis, A ;
Schull, M ;
McKnight, RD ;
Verbeek, R ;
Brison, R ;
Cass, D ;
Dreyer, J ;
Eisenhauer, MA ;
Greenberg, GH ;
MacPhail, I ;
Morrison, L ;
Reardon, M ;
Worthington, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (15) :1841-1848
[55]   Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of patients with low back pain [J].
Strender, LE ;
Sjoblom, A ;
Sundell, K ;
Ludwig, R ;
Taube, A .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (07) :814-820
[56]   PAIN DRAWINGS IN CHRONIC BACK PAIN [J].
UDEN, A ;
ASTROM, M ;
BERGENUDD, H .
SPINE, 1988, 13 (04) :389-392
[57]   Exercise therapy for low back pain - A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration back review group [J].
van Tulder, M ;
Malmivaara, A ;
Esmail, R ;
Koes, B .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (21) :2784-2796
[58]   Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain - A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration back review group [J].
van Tulder, MW ;
Scholten, RJPM ;
Koes, BW ;
Deyo, RA .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (19) :2501-2513
[59]  
Van Tulder MW, 2000, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DOI [DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000335, 10.1002/14651858.CD000335]
[60]   Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain - A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions [J].
vanTulder, MW ;
Koes, BW ;
Bouter, LM .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (18) :2128-2156