Replacing trip limits with individual transferable quotas: implications for discarding

被引:65
作者
Branch, TA
Rutherford, K
Hilborn, R
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Pacific Reg Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Sci Branch, Pacific Biol Stn, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7, Canada
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
individual transferable quotas; ITQs; discards; bycatch; IFQs; IVQs; trip limits;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2004.12.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the British Columbia groundfish fishery (BC fishery), full observer coverage and the accounting of discard mortality of marketable fish in landing limits resulted in low discard Fractions. When individual transferable quotas (ITQs) were additionally introduced, total discard fractions declined for most species, and marketable discard fractions declined from 0.20% to 0.10%, after an adjustment period. In contrast, the US West Coast groundfish fishery, which is regulated by 2-monthly landing limits, has higher discard fractions (31-43% vs. 14-19% for BC). The BC experience suggests that full observer coverage, ITQs, and mortality accounting Would reduce West Coast discarding fractions, but severe catch restrictions on overfished West Coast species may limit such reductions. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 292
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条