Mitigation alternatives to decrease nitrous oxides emissions and urea-nitrogen loss and their effect on methane flux

被引:157
作者
Delgado, JA
Mosier, AR
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500050025x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) are greenhouse gases that are contributing to global warming potential. Nitrogen (N) fertilizer is one of the most important sources of anthropogenic N2O emissions. A field study was conducted to compare N-use efficiency and effect on N2O and CH4 flux, of urea, urea plus the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (U + DCD), and a control release fertilizer, polyolefin coated urea (POCU) in irrigated spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in northeastern Colorado. Each treatment received 90 kg urea-N ha(-1) and microplots labeled with N-15-fertilizer were established. Average N2O emissions were 4.5, 5.2, 6.9, and 8.2 g N ha(-1) d(-1) for control, U + DCD, POCU, and urea, respectively. During the initial 21 d after fertilization, N2O emissions were reduced by 82 and 71% in the U + DCD and POCU treatments, respectively, but continued release of N fertilizer from POCU maintained higher N2O emissions through the remainder of the growing season. No treatment effect on CH4 oxidation in soils was observed. Fertilizer N-15 found 50 to 110 cm below the soil surface was lower in the POCU and U + DCD treatments. At harvest, recovery of N-15-fertilizer in the plant-soil system was 98, 90, and 85% from POCU, urea, and U + DCD, respectively. Grain yield was 2.2, 2.5, and 2.7 Mg ha(-1) for POCU, urea, and U + DCD, respectively. Dicyandiamide and POCU showed the potential to be used as mitigation alternatives to decrease N2O emissions from N fertilizer and movement of N out of the root zone, but N release from POCU does need to be formulated to better match crop growth demands.
引用
收藏
页码:1105 / 1111
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]  
MOSIER AR, 1996, IN PRESS PLANT SOIL
[32]   THE USE OF NITROGEN-FERTILIZER IN AGRICULTURE - WHERE DO WE GO PRACTICALLY AND ECOLOGICALLY [J].
NEWBOULD, P .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1989, 115 (02) :297-311
[33]  
Paustian K., 1995, ADV SOIL SCI, P69
[34]  
Peoples M. B., 1995, Nitrogen fertilization in the environment., P565
[35]   GASEOUS LOSS OF AMMONIA FROM SULFUR-COATED UREA, AMMONIUM-SULFATE, AND UREA APPLIED TO CALCAREOUS SOIL (PH 7.3) [J].
PRASAD, M .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1976, 40 (01) :130-134
[36]   COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 CONTROLLED-RELEASE FERTILIZERS ON SELECTED FOLIAGE PLANTS IN AN ARTIFICIAL POTTING MIX [J].
RAUCH, FD ;
MURAKAMI, PK .
FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1994, 39 (02) :89-95
[37]  
Reeburgh W. S., 1993, P1
[38]  
*SAS I, 1988, SAS STAT US GUID VER
[39]   CONTROLLED-RELEASE FERTILIZERS TO INCREASE EFFICIENCY OF NUTRIENT USE AND MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION - A REVIEW [J].
SHAVIV, A ;
MIKKELSEN, RL .
FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1993, 35 (1-2) :1-12
[40]   USE OF POLYOELFIN-COATED FERTILIZERS FOR INCREASING FERTILIZER EFFICIENCY AND REDUCING NITRATE LEACHING AND NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS [J].
SHOJI, S ;
KANNO, H .
FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1994, 39 (02) :147-152