Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: Patterns, mechanisms, and research needs

被引:508
作者
Hansen, AJ
Knight, RL
Marzluff, JM
Powell, S
Brown, K
Gude, PH
Jones, A
机构
[1] Montana State Univ, Dept Ecol, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Forest Rangeland & Watershed Stewardship, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Coll Forest Resources, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
biodiversity; biotic interactions; ecological mechanisms; fire; habitat fragmentation; landscape management; land cover; land use; rural residential development; urban fringe development; weeds; CONTERMINOUS UNITED-STATES; NEST-SITE SELECTION; LAND-USE; RURAL LAND; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; COLORADO MOUNTAINS; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; URBAN GRADIENT; COMMUNITIES; HABITAT;
D O I
10.1890/05-5221
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Low-density rural home development is the fastest-growing form of land use in the United States since 1950. This "exurban" development (similar to 6-25 homes/km(2)) includes urban fringe development (UFD) on the periphery of cities and rural residential development (RRD) in rural areas attractive in natural amenities. This paper synthesizes current knowledge on the effects of UFD and RRD. We present two case studies and examine the patterns of biodiversity response and the ecological mechanisms that may underlie these responses. We found that many native species have reduced survival and reproduction near homes, and native species richness often drops with increased exurban densities. Exotic species, some human-adapted native species, and species from early successional stages often increase with exurban development. These relationships are sometimes nonlinear, with sharp thresholds in biodiversity response. These effects may be manifest for several decades following exurban development, so that biodiversity is likely still responding to the wave of exurban expansion that has occurred since 1950. The location of exurban development is often nonrandom relative to biodiversity because both are influenced by biophysical factors. Consequently, the effects on biodiversity may be disproportionately large relative to the area of exurban development. RRD is more likely than UFD to occur near public lands; hence it may have a larger influence on nature reserves and wilderness species. The ecological mechanisms that may underlie these responses involve alteration of habitat, ecological processes, biotic interactions, and increased human disturbance. Research on the patterns and mechanisms of biodiversity remains underdeveloped, and comparative and experimental studies are needed. Knowledge resulting from such studies will increase our ability to understand, manage, and mitigate negative impacts on biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:1893 / 1905
页数:13
相关论文
共 89 条
[11]   CHANGES IN WETLANDS ON NONFEDERAL RURAL LAND OF THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED-STATES FROM 1982 TO 1987 [J].
BRADY, SJ ;
FLATHER, CH .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1994, 18 (05) :693-705
[12]  
Brown BT, 1997, J RAPTOR RES, V31, P7
[13]   Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950-2000 [J].
Brown, DG ;
Johnson, KM ;
Loveland, TR ;
Theobald, DM .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2005, 15 (06) :1851-1863
[14]   Impacts of lakeshore residential development on coarse woody debris in north temperate lakes [J].
Christensen, DL ;
Herwig, BR ;
Schindler, DE ;
Carpenter, SR .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (04) :1143-1149
[15]  
Coppedge Bryan R., 2001, P225
[16]  
Cromartie J.B., 1999, RURAL DEV PERSPECTIV, V14, P2
[17]   Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system [J].
Crooks, KR ;
Soulé, ME .
NATURE, 1999, 400 (6744) :563-566
[18]  
Daniels T., 1999, When City and Country Collide
[19]   Wildlife ecology - Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife - Threats to biodiversity and human health [J].
Daszak, P ;
Cunningham, AA ;
Hyatt, AD .
SCIENCE, 2000, 287 (5452) :443-449
[20]   Insect communities on experimental mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) plots along an urban gradient [J].
Denys, C ;
Schmidt, H .
OECOLOGIA, 1998, 113 (02) :269-277