Negotiators who give too much: Unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining

被引:87
作者
Amanatullah, Emily T. [1 ]
Morris, Michael W. [2 ]
Curhan, Jared R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, McCombs Sch Business, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch Business, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] MIT, Alfred P Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
personality; negotiation; distributive; integrative; relational accommodating;
D O I
10.1037/a0012612
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A series of studies found that the personality dimension of unmitigated communion (H. L. Fritz & V. S. Helgeson, 1998) leads negotiators to make concessions to avoid straining relationships. Results indicate that even within the population of successful business executives, this dimension of relational anxiety can be identified distinctly from more general relational orientations, such as agreeableness, and that it distinctly predicts accommodating tendencies in everyday conflicts. In economic games, unmitigated communion predicts giving in contexts in which the relational norm of reciprocity applies, but not in contexts tapping instrumental or altruistic motives for cooperation. In distributive negotiations, the effect of unmitigated communion in lowering a negotiator's outcome is mediated by prenegotiation anxieties about relational strain and plans to make large concessions if needed to avoid impasse (lower reservation points). In integrative negotiations, high unmitigated communion on both sides of the negotiation dyad results in relational accommodation, evidenced by decreased success in maximizing economic joint gain but increased subjective satisfaction with the relationship.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 738
页数:16
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance [J].
Allred, KG ;
Mallozzi, JS ;
Matsui, F ;
Raia, CP .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 70 (03) :175-187
[2]  
AMANATULLAH ET, 2007, NEGOTIATING TO UNPUB
[3]   Affect from the top down: How powerful individuals' positive affect shapes negotiations [J].
Anderson, C ;
Thompson, LL .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2004, 95 (02) :125-139
[4]  
[Anonymous], APPROPRIATENES UNPUB
[5]  
Babcock L., 2006, Social Psychology and Economics, P239
[6]  
Bakan D., 1966, The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man
[7]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[8]   Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation [J].
Barry, B ;
Friedman, RA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (02) :345-359
[9]   Should I stay or should i go? Predicting team members' intent to remain in the team [J].
Bayazit, M ;
Mannix, EA .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2003, 34 (03) :290-321
[10]   Negotiation [J].
Bazerman, MH ;
Curhan, JR ;
Moore, DA ;
Valley, KL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 51 :279-314