Power Reduces the Press of the Situation: Implications for Creativity, Conformity, and Dissonance

被引:587
作者
Galinsky, Adam D. [1 ]
Magee, Joe C. [2 ]
Gruenfeld, Deborah H. [3 ]
Whitson, Jennifer A. [4 ]
Liljenquist, Katie A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, 2001 Sheridan Rd, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] NYU, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[5] Brigham Young Univ, Marriott Sch Management, Provo 84602, UT USA
关键词
power; influence; conformity; dissonance; creativity;
D O I
10.1037/a0012633
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although power is often conceptualized as the capacity to influence others, the current research explores whether power psychologically protects people from influence. In contrast to classic social psychological research demonstrating the strength of the situation in directing attitudes, expressions. and intentions, 5 experiments (using experiential primes, semantic primes, and role manipulations of power) demonstrate that the powerful (a) generate creative ideas that are less influenced by salient examples, (b) express attitudes that conform less to the expressed opinions of others, (c) are more influenced by their own social value orientation relative to the reputation of a negotiating opponent, and (d) perceive greater choice in making counterattitudinal statements. This last experiment illustrates that power is not always psychologically liberating; it can create internal conflict, arousing dissonance, and thereby lead to attitude change. Across the experiments, high-power participants were immune to the typical press of situations. with intrapsychic processes having greater sway than situational or interpersonal ones on their creative and attitudinal expressions.
引用
收藏
页码:1450 / 1466
页数:17
相关论文
共 97 条
[61]   GROUP AS A POLARIZER OF ATTITUDES [J].
MOSCOVIC.S ;
ZAVALLON.M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 12 (02) :125-&
[62]   DIFFERENTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF MAJORITY AND MINORITY INFLUENCE [J].
NEMETH, CJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1986, 93 (01) :23-32
[63]   MINORITY INFLUENCE, DIVERGENT THINKING AND DETECTION OF CORRECT SOLUTIONS [J].
NEMETH, CJ ;
KWAN, JL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 17 (09) :788-799
[64]   ORIGINALITY OF WORD-ASSOCIATIONS AS A FUNCTION OF MAJORITY VS MINORITY INFLUENCE [J].
NEMETH, CJ ;
KWAN, JL .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1985, 48 (03) :277-282
[65]   Social value orientations and strategy choices in competitive negotiations [J].
Olekalns, M ;
Smith, PL .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1999, 25 (06) :657-668
[66]  
Osborn A. F., 1953, Applied imagination
[67]   The powerful want to, the powerless have to: Perceived constraint moderates causal attributions [J].
Overbeck, Jennifer R. ;
Tiedens, Larissa Z. ;
Brion, Sebastien .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 36 (04) :479-496
[68]   Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders' social attention [J].
Overbeck, JR ;
Park, B .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2006, 99 (02) :227-243
[69]   Retrospection in social dilemmas: How thinking about the past affects future cooperation [J].
Parks, CD ;
Sanna, LJ ;
Posey, DC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (05) :988-996
[70]  
Pervin L.A., 1999, Handbook of personality. Theory and research, V2nd