Biomonitoring for deposited sediment using benthic invertebrates: a test on 4 Missouri streams

被引:143
作者
Zweig, LD
Rabeni, CF
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, US Geol Survey, Missouri Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY | 2001年 / 20卷 / 04期
关键词
streams; sediment; siltation; biomonitoring; benthic invertebrates; metrics; tolerance values; Missouri;
D O I
10.2307/1468094
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The response of stream benthic invertebrates to surficially deposited fine sediment was investigated in 4 Missouri streams. Twenty to 24 sampling sites in each stream were selected based on similarities of substrate particle-size distributions, depths, and current velocities but for differences in amounts of deposited sediment, which ranged from 0 to 100% surface cover. Deposited sediment was quantified 2 ways: a visual estimate of % surface cover, and a measurement of substrate embeddedness, which were highly correlated with each other and with the amount of sand. Invertebrates were collected using a kicknet for a specified time in a 1-m(2) area. Five commonly used biomonitoring metrics (taxa richness, density, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera [EPT] richness, EPT density; and EPT/Chironomidae richness) were consistently significantly correlated across streams to deposited sediment. Shannon diversity index, Chironomidae richness, Chironomidae density, a biotic index, and % dominant taxon did not relate to increasing levels of deposited sediment. Tolerance values representing taxa responses to deposited sediment were developed for 30 taxa. Deposited-sediment tolerance values were not correlated with biotic index tolerance values, indicating a different response by taxa to deposited sediment than to organic enrichment. Deposited-sediment tolerance values were used to develop the Deposited Sediment Biotic Index (DSBI). The DSBI was calculated for all samples (n = 85) to characterize sediment impairment of the sampled streams. DSBI values for each site were highly correlated with measures of deposited sediment. Model validation by a resampling procedure confirmed that the DSBI is a potentially useful tool for assessing ecological effects of deposited sediment.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 657
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]  
CUMMINS K W, 1969, Hydrobiologia, V34, P145, DOI 10.1007/BF00141925
[12]   A LEISURELY LOOK AT THE BOOTSTRAP, THE JACKKNIFE, AND CROSS-VALIDATION [J].
EFRON, B ;
GONG, G .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1983, 37 (01) :36-48
[13]  
ERMAN DC, 1984, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V108, P75, DOI 10.1007/BF00028185
[14]  
GROST R T, 1991, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V11, P347, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(1991)011<0347:FCOTDU>2.3.CO
[15]  
2
[16]  
HALLTJ, 1984, TECHNICAL B NATL COU, V418
[17]   VARIABILITY IN MACROINVERTEBRATE RAPID-BIOASSESSMENT SURVEYS AND HABITAT ASSESSMENTS IN A NORTHERN CALIFORNIA STREAM [J].
HANNAFORD, MJ ;
RESH, VH .
JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1995, 14 (03) :430-439
[18]   Implications of taxonomic resolution and sample habitat for stream classification at a broad geographic scale [J].
Hewlett, R .
JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 19 (02) :352-361
[19]  
HILSENHOFF W L, 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, V7, P65, DOI 10.2307/1467832
[20]  
HILSENHOFF WL, 1987, GREAT LAKES ENTOMOL, V20, P31