TASSER: An automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6

被引:107
作者
Zhang, Y [1 ]
Arakaki, AK [1 ]
Skolnick, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Ctr Excellence Bioinformat, Buffalo, NY 14203 USA
关键词
comparative modeling; threading; ab initio; prediction; TASSER; PROSPECTOR_3;
D O I
10.1002/prot.20724
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The recently developed TASSER (Threading/ASSembly/Refinement) method is applied to predict the tertiary structures of all CASP6 targets. TASSER is a hierarchical approach that consists of template identification by the threading program PROSPECTOR_3, followed by tertiary structure assembly via rearranging continuous template fragments. Assembly occurs using parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling under the guide of an optimized, reduced force field that includes knowledge-based statistical potentials and spatial restraints extracted from threading alignments. Models are automatically selected from the Monte Carlo trajectories in the low-temperature replicas using the clustering program SPICKER. For all 90 CASP targets/domains, PROSPECTOR_3 generates initial alignments with an average root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) to native of 8.4 angstrom with 79% coverage. After TASSER reassembly, the average RMSD decreases to 5.4 angstrom over the same aligned residues; the overall cumulative TM-score increases from 39.44 to 52.53. Despite significant improvements over the PROSPECTOR_3 template alignment observed in all target categories, the overall quality of the final models is essentially dictated by the quality of threading templates: The average TM-scores of TASSER models in the three categories are, respectively, 0.79 [comparative modeling (CM), 43 targets/domains], 0.47 [fold recognition (FR), 37 targets/domains], and 0.30 [new fold (NF), 10 targets/domains]. This highlights the need to develop novel (or improved) approaches to identify very distant targets as well as better NF algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 98
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Large-scale assessment of the utility of low-resolution protein structures for biochemical function assignment [J].
Arakaki, AK ;
Zhang, Y ;
Skolnick, J .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (07) :1087-1096
[2]   Protein structure prediction and structural genomics [J].
Baker, D ;
Sali, A .
SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5540) :93-96
[3]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[4]   A METHOD TO IDENTIFY PROTEIN SEQUENCES THAT FOLD INTO A KNOWN 3-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE [J].
BOWIE, JU ;
LUTHY, R ;
EISENBERG, D .
SCIENCE, 1991, 253 (5016) :164-170
[5]  
Feig M, 2000, PROTEINS, V41, P86, DOI 10.1002/1097-0134(20001001)41:1<86::AID-PROT110>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-Y
[7]   3D-SHOTGUN: A novel, cooperative, fold-recognition meta-predictor [J].
Fischer, D .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 51 (03) :434-441
[8]   Protein structure prediction of CASP5 comparative modeling and fold recognition targets using consensus alignment approach and 3D assessment [J].
Ginalski, K ;
Rychlewski, L .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 53 :410-417
[9]   3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions [J].
Ginalski, K ;
Elofsson, A ;
Fischer, D ;
Rychlewski, L .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (08) :1015-1018
[10]   Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices [J].
Jones, DT .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1999, 292 (02) :195-202