Sensitivity maps for low-contrast perturbations within conducting background in magnetic induction tomography

被引:42
作者
Scharfetter, H
Riu, P
Populo, M
Rosell, J
机构
[1] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Biomed Engn, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[2] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Elect Engn, ES-08034 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
magnetic induction tomography; sensitivity distribution; low contrast objects; backprojection;
D O I
10.1088/0967-3334/23/1/320
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Magnetic induction tomography (MIT) is a contactless method for mapping the electrical conductivity of tissue by measuring the perturbation of an alternating magnetic field with appropriate receiver coils. Reconstruction algorithms so far suggested for biomedical applications are based on weighted backprojection, hence requiring tube-shaped zones of sensitivity between excitation coils and receiving coils, the sensitivity being essentially zero outside this 'projection beam'. This condition is met for conducting perturbations in empty space and for some special configurations of insulators in saline. In biological structures, however, perturbations with low conductivity contrast are embedded into a bulk conductor. The respective sensitivity distribution was investigated and quantified theoretically and experimentally by displacing a conducting (agar, 8 S m(-1)) and an insulating sphere within a saline tank (4 S m(-1)). In contrast to the case in the empty space the sensitivity is not confined to a tube but even increases outside the 'projection beam'. The difference can be explained by the interaction of bulk currents with the perturbing object. This effect invalidates backprojection and hence the solution of the complete inverse eddy-current problem is suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
BOCANEGRA JM, 1995, DEMODULADOR COHERENT
[2]   Magnetic induction tomography - A measuring system for biological tissues [J].
Griffiths, H ;
Stewart, WR ;
Gough, W .
ELECTRICAL BIOIMPEDANCE METHODS: APPLICATIONS TO MEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1999, 873 :335-345
[3]   Magnetic induction tomography: experimental realization [J].
Korjenevsky, A ;
Cherepenin, V ;
Sapetsky, S .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2000, 21 (01) :89-94
[4]   Progress in realization of magnetic induction tomography [J].
Korjenevsky, AV ;
Cherepenin, VA .
ELECTRICAL BIOIMPEDANCE METHODS: APPLICATIONS TO MEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1999, 873 :346-352
[5]   A numerical model for magnetic induction tomographic measurements in biological tissues [J].
Morris, A ;
Griffiths, H ;
Gough, W .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 22 (01) :113-119
[6]   ELECTROMAGNETIC IMAGING USING MUTUAL INDUCTANCE TOMOGRAPHY - POTENTIAL FOR PROCESS APPLICATIONS [J].
PEYTON, AJ ;
YU, ZZ ;
ALZEIBAK, S ;
SAUNDERS, NH ;
BORGES, AR .
PARTICLE & PARTICLE SYSTEMS CHARACTERIZATION, 1995, 12 (02) :68-74
[7]   Sensitivity maps and system requirements for magnetic induction tomography using a planar gradiometer [J].
Rosell, J ;
Casañas, R ;
Scharfetter, H .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 22 (01) :121-130
[8]   Magnetic induction tomography: hardware for multi-frequency measurements in biological tissues [J].
Scharfetter, H ;
Lackner, HK ;
Rosell, J .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 22 (01) :131-146
[9]  
Taflove A., 1995, COMPUTATIONAL ELECTR