Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials

被引:215
作者
van Berkum, JJA [1 ]
Brown, CM [1 ]
Hagoort, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, NL-6500 AH Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
discourse context; referential ambiguity; parsing; syntactic ambiguity resolution; ERP;
D O I
10.1006/jmla.1999.2641
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
An event-related brain potentials experiment was carried out to examine the interplay of referential and structural factors during sentence processing in discourse. Subjects read (Dutch) sentences beginning like "David told the girl that..." in short story contexts that had introduced either one or two referents for a critical singular noun phrase ("the girl"). The waveforms showed that within 280 ms after onset of the critical noun the reader had already determined whether the noun phrase had a unique referent in earlier discourse. Furthermore, this referential information was immediately used in parsing the rest of the sentence, which was briefly ambiguous between a complement clause ("...that there would be some visitors") and a relative clause ("...that had been on the phone to hang up"). A consistent pattern of P600/SPS effects elicited by various subsequent disambiguations revealed that a two-referent discourse context had led the parser to initially pursue the relative-clause alternative to a larger extent than a one-referent context. Together, the results suggest that during the processing of sentences in discourse, structural and referential sources of information interact on a word-by-word basis. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 182
页数:36
相关论文
共 89 条
[71]   DISCOURSE INFLUENCES DURING PARSING ARE DELAYED [J].
RAYNER, K ;
GARROD, S ;
PERFETTI, CA .
COGNITION, 1992, 45 (02) :109-139
[72]  
Rayner K., 1994, Handbook of psycholinguistics, P57
[73]  
Rayner K., 1989, PSYCHOL READING
[74]   Parsing of sentences in a language with varying word order: Word-by-word variations of processing demands are revealed by event-related brain potentials [J].
Rosler, F ;
Pechmann, T ;
Streb, J ;
Roder, B ;
Hennighausen, E .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (02) :150-176
[75]   MONITORING RETRIEVAL FROM LONG-TERM-MEMORY BY SLOW EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS [J].
ROSLER, F ;
HEIL, M ;
GLOWALLA, U .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 30 (02) :170-182
[76]   Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency [J].
Spivey, MJ ;
Tanenhaus, MK .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1998, 24 (06) :1521-1543
[77]  
SPIVEYKNOWLTON M, 1994, PERSPECTIVES ON SENTENCE PROCESSING, P415
[78]   RESOLVING ATTACHMENT AMBIGUITIES WITH MULTIPLE CONSTRAINTS [J].
SPIVEYKNOWLTON, M ;
SEDIVY, JC .
COGNITION, 1995, 55 (03) :227-267
[79]   CONTEXT EFFECTS IN SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION - DISCOURSE AND SEMANTIC INFLUENCES IN PARSING REDUCED RELATIVE CLAUSES [J].
SPIVEYKNOWLTON, MJ ;
TRUESWELL, JC ;
TANENHAUS, MK .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 1993, 47 (02) :276-309
[80]   Individual differences in inference generation: An ERP analysis [J].
St George, M ;
Mannes, S ;
Hoffman, JE .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 9 (06) :776-787