Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Prostate Cancer Versus Noncancerous Tissue According to Anatomical Region

被引:66
作者
Kim, Jeoung Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Jeong Kon [1 ]
Park, Bum-Woo [1 ]
Kim, Namkug [1 ]
Cho, Kyoung-Sik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Dept Radiol, Asan Med Ctr, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
neoplasms; prostatic; diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; anatomy; regional; comparative study;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.21513
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in differentiating prostate cancer from noncancerous tissue according to anatomical region. Materials and Methods: In 47 patients with diffusion-weighted-MR (b-value, 0 and 1000 see/mm(2)) on a 1.5 T unit, ADCs were measured in prostate cancer and in three noncancerous tissues (transitional zone, peripheral zone, and prostatic base). Diagnostic performance of ADC for differentiating cancer from noncancerous tissue was evaluated using receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) analysis. Results: Mean ADC of prostate cancer (0.963 X 10(-3) mm(2)/s) was lower than those of all noncancerous tissues (P < 0.001). In noncancerous tissue, ADC differed according to anatomical region (peripheral zone, 1.572 X 10(-3) mm(2)/sec: transitional zone, 1.441 X 10-3 mm(2)/sec; prostatic base, 1.146 X 10(-3) mm(2)/sec) (P < 0.01). ADC was lower in prostate cancer than in all noncancerous tissues In 34 (72%) patients. Area under the ROC curve for differentiating cancer from noncancerous tissue in prostatic base (0.725) was less than those for differentiating cancer from noncancerous tissue in peripheral (0.952) and transitional zones (0.906) (P < 0.05). Sensitivity differed according to anatomical region (peripheral zone, 98%: transitional zone, 82%; prostatic base, 66%) (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Variable ADC in noncancerous tissue according to anatomical region may limit diagnostic performance of ADC for cancer detection.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1179
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Functional MR imaging of prostate cancer [J].
Choi, Young Jun ;
Kim, Jeong Kon ;
Kim, Namkug ;
Kim, Kyoung Won ;
Choi, Eugene K. ;
Cho, Kyoung-Sik .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 (01) :63-U8
[2]   Radiologic anatomy of the prostate gland: A clinical approach [J].
Coakley, FV ;
Hricak, H .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 38 (01) :15-+
[3]   Diffusion-weighted MRI of soft tissue tumours [J].
Einarsdóttir, H ;
Karlsson, M ;
Wejde, J ;
Bauer, HCF .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (06) :959-963
[4]  
Filippi CG, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P65
[5]   Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diflusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Tozer, DJ ;
Liney, GP ;
Turnbull, LW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (06) :1054-1058
[6]  
Hoehn-Berlage M, 1999, NMR BIOMED, V12, P45, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199902)12:1<45::AID-NBM545>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-6
[8]   Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue [J].
Hosseinzadeh, K ;
Schwarz, SD .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 20 (04) :654-661
[9]   In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging [J].
Issa, B .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (02) :196-200
[10]  
JOHN EM, 1981, PROSTATE, V2, P35