Dye-bias correction in dual-labeled cDNA microarray gene expression measurements

被引:57
作者
Rosenzweig, BA
Pine, PS
Domon, OE
Morris, SM
Chen, JJ
Sistare, FD
机构
[1] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Div Appl Pharmacol Res, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] US FDA, Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
关键词
cDNA; dye bias; dye swap; genomics; microarray;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.6694
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A significant limitation to the analytical accuracy and precision of dual-labeled spotted cDNA microarrays is the signal error due to dye bias. Transcript-dependent dye bias may be due to gene-specific differences of incorporation of two distinctly different chemical dyes and the resultant differential hybridization efficiencies of these two chemically different targets for the same probe. Several approaches were used to assess and minimize the effects of dye bias on fluorescent hybridization signals and maximize the experimental design efficiency of a cell culture experiment. Dye bias was measured at the individual transcript level within each batch of simultaneously processed arrays by replicate dual-labeled split-control sample hybridizations and accounted for a significant component of fluorescent signal differences. This transcript-dependent dye bias alone could introduce unacceptably high numbers of both false-positive and false-negative signals. We found that within a given set of concurrently processed hybridizations, the bias is remarkably consistent and therefore measurable and correctable. The additional microarrays and reagents required for paired technical replicate dye-swap corrections commonly performed to control for dye bias could be costly to end users. Incorporating split-control microarrays within a set of concurrently processed hybridizations to specifically measure dye bias can eliminate the need for technical dye swap replicates and reduce microarray and reagent costs while maintaining experimental accuracy and technical precision. These data support a practical and more efficient experimental design to measure and mathematically correct for dye bias.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 487
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
AKERMAN GS, IN PRESS MUTAT RES
[2]  
Cleveland WS, 1992, Statistical Models in S, P309, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9780203738535-8, 10.1201/9780203738535]
[3]   Statistical design of reverse dye microarrays [J].
Dobbin, K ;
Shih, JH ;
Simon, R .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (07) :803-810
[4]   Unfolding of microarray data [J].
Goryachev, AB ;
MacGregor, PF ;
Edwards, AM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 8 (04) :443-461
[5]   Testing for differentially-expressed genes by maximum-likelihood analysis of microarray data [J].
Ideker, T ;
Thorsson, V ;
Siegel, AF ;
Hood, LE .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (06) :805-817
[6]   Analysis of variance for gene expression microarray data [J].
Kerr, MK ;
Martin, M ;
Churchill, GA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (06) :819-837
[7]  
*QIAG INC, 1999, RNEASY MID MAX HDB
[8]   Microarray data normalization and transformation [J].
Quackenbush, J .
NATURE GENETICS, 2002, 32 (Suppl 4) :496-501
[9]   Issues in cDNA microarray analysis: quality filtering, channel normalization, models of variations and assessment of gene effects [J].
Tseng, GC ;
Oh, MK ;
Rohlin, L ;
Liao, JC ;
Wong, WH .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2001, 29 (12) :2549-2557
[10]   Quantitative quality control in microarray image processing and data acquisition [J].
Wang, X ;
Ghosh, S ;
Guo, SW .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2001, 29 (15)