Default risk-based probabilistic decision model for risk management and control

被引:37
作者
Chen, Cheng-Wu [1 ,2 ]
Tseng, Chun-Pin [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Kaohsiung Marine Univ, Inst Maritime Informat & Technol, Kaohsiung 80543, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Global Earth Observat & Data Anal Ctr GEODAC, Tainan 701, Taiwan
[3] Chung Shan Inst Sci & Technol, Armaments Bur, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
关键词
Risk control; Decision model; Natural disaster;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-012-0183-8
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study describes how risk-based risk control allocation models work. We begin by discussing the economic rationale for allocating risk control in a diversified organization such as an enterprise. For a probability model for risk control decision making under uncertainty and risk, we propose a model involving stochastic total loss amount constraints with respect to various tolerable default levels. Our main objective is to develop a method that will allow shaping of the risk associated with risk control outcomes. The direct and indirect losses caused by simulated disasters can be estimated using an engineering and financial analysis model. Based on this model, we can generate an exceeding probability curve and then calculate how much of the loss can be eliminated or transferred to other entities should funds be allocated to risk control. The optimal natural disaster risk control arrangement with a probabilistic formulation is explained in this paper. Results from the proposed formulations are compared in case studies. The model attempts to apply risk-based budget guidelines to risk reduction measurement within a portfolio-based risk framework.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 671
页数:13
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Developing utility functions for environmental decision making [J].
Accorsi, R ;
Zio, E ;
Apostolakis, GE .
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 1999, 34 (04) :387-411
[2]   THE BASE-RATE FALLACY IN PROBABILITY JUDGMENTS [J].
BARHILLEL, M .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1980, 44 (03) :211-233
[3]   A web-based multi-perspective decision support system for information security planning [J].
El-Gayar, Omar F. ;
Fritz, Brian D. .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 50 (01) :43-54
[4]   Towards a multi-dimensional project Performance Measurement System [J].
Lauras, Matthieu ;
Marques, Guillaume ;
Gourc, Didier .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 48 (02) :342-353
[5]   Kalman filter decision systems for debris flow hazard assessment [J].
Lin, Jeng-Wen ;
Chen, Cheng-Wu ;
Peng, Cheng-Yi .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 60 (03) :1255-1266
[6]  
Power D.J., 2001, International Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Management, V31, P247, DOI DOI 10.1108/09600030110394923
[7]   International supply chain agility - Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty [J].
Prater, E ;
Biehl, M ;
Smith, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2001, 21 (5-6) :823-839
[8]  
RAVIV A, 1979, AM ECON REV, V69, P84
[9]  
Singh MD., 2003, J ADV MANAG RES, V1, P27
[10]   Natural disaster management mechanisms for probabilistic earthquake loss [J].
Tseng, Chun-Pin ;
Chen, Cheng-Wu .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 60 (03) :1055-1063