Towards a multi-dimensional project Performance Measurement System

被引:59
作者
Lauras, Matthieu [1 ,2 ]
Marques, Guillaume [1 ]
Gourc, Didier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, Ctr Genie Ind, F-81013 Albi, France
[2] Toulouse Business Sch, Dept Ind Org Logist & Technol, F-31068 Toulouse 7, France
关键词
Project performance; Performance Measurement System; Project management; Multiple criteria analysis; Decision Support Systems; MACBETH; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2009.09.002
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the difficulty of controlling a complex project caused by the great number of performance indicators. The problem studied is how to allow project managers to better control the performance of their projects. From a literature review we noted several critical aspects to this problem: there are many dimensions for evaluating project performance (cost, time, quality, risk, etc.); performance factors should be able to be relevantly aggregated for controlling the project, but no formalized tool exists to do this. We suggest a method to facilitate project performance analysis via a multi-criteria approach. The method focuses on three particular axes for the analysis of project performance: project task, performance indicator categories, and a breakdown of the performance triptych (Effectiveness. Efficiency, Relevance). Finally, the MACBETH method is used to aggregate performance expressions. An application case study examining a real project management situation is included to illustrate the implementation. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 353
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline
    Amott, David
    Pervan, Graham
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2008, 44 (03) : 657 - 672
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge
  • [3] [Anonymous], THESIS U SAVOIE
  • [4] Atkinson R., 1999, International Journal of Project Management, V17, P337, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6, 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6]
  • [5] A career choice problem: An example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments
    Bana E Costa, CA
    Chagas, MP
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 153 (02) : 323 - 331
  • [6] MACBETH
    Bana E Costa, Carlos A.
    De Corte, Jean-Marie
    Vansnick, Jean-Claude
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2012, 11 (02) : 359 - 387
  • [7] Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach
    Bhagwat, Rajat
    Sharma, Milind Kumar
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 53 (01) : 43 - 62
  • [8] Bourne M., 2003, International Journal of Business Performance Management, V5, P1, DOI 10.1504/IJBPM.2003.002097
  • [9] Screening in multiple criteria decision analysis
    Chen, Ye
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    Hipel, Keith W.
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2008, 45 (02) : 280 - 292
  • [10] PPMS: a Web-based construction project performance monitoring system
    Cheung, SO
    Suen, HCH
    Cheung, KKW
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 13 (03) : 361 - 376