Towards a multi-dimensional project Performance Measurement System

被引:59
作者
Lauras, Matthieu [1 ,2 ]
Marques, Guillaume [1 ]
Gourc, Didier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, Ctr Genie Ind, F-81013 Albi, France
[2] Toulouse Business Sch, Dept Ind Org Logist & Technol, F-31068 Toulouse 7, France
关键词
Project performance; Performance Measurement System; Project management; Multiple criteria analysis; Decision Support Systems; MACBETH; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2009.09.002
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the difficulty of controlling a complex project caused by the great number of performance indicators. The problem studied is how to allow project managers to better control the performance of their projects. From a literature review we noted several critical aspects to this problem: there are many dimensions for evaluating project performance (cost, time, quality, risk, etc.); performance factors should be able to be relevantly aggregated for controlling the project, but no formalized tool exists to do this. We suggest a method to facilitate project performance analysis via a multi-criteria approach. The method focuses on three particular axes for the analysis of project performance: project task, performance indicator categories, and a breakdown of the performance triptych (Effectiveness. Efficiency, Relevance). Finally, the MACBETH method is used to aggregate performance expressions. An application case study examining a real project management situation is included to illustrate the implementation. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 353
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Roy Bernard., 1996, MULTICRITERIA METHOD
  • [32] SWINK M, 2005, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM, V24, P542
  • [33] Westerveld E., 2003, International Journal of Project Management, V21, P411, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00112-6
  • [34] Yu A. G., 2005, International Journal of Project Management, V23, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.008
  • [35] Zwikael O., 2005, International Journal of Project Management, V23, P454, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.04.003