Subthreshold low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively decreases facilitation in the motor cortex

被引:183
作者
Romero, JR [1 ]
Anschel, D [1 ]
Sparing, R [1 ]
Gangitano, M [1 ]
Pascual-Leone, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Neurol,Lab Magnet Brain Stimulat, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; modulation; cortical excitability; intra-cortical circuits; human motor cortex;
D O I
10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00693-9
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To investigate the modulatory effect of a subthreshold low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) train on motor cortex excitability. Methods: The study consisted of two separate experiments. Subjects received a 10 min long subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS train. In the first experiment, (single pulse paradigm), cortical excitability was assessed by measuring the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) before and after the rTMS train. In the second experiment, a paired pulse paradigm was employed. Results: Corticospinal excitability, as measured by the MEP amplitude, was reduced by the rTMS train (experiment 1), with a significant effect lasting for about 10 min after the train completion. There was notable inter-individual as well as intra-individual variability in the effect. rTMS produced a significant decrease in intra-cortical facilitation as measured by the paired pulse paradigm (experiment 2). This effect lasted for up to 15 min following the train. Intra-cortical inhibition was not significantly affected. Conclusions: Subthreshold low frequency rTMS depresses cortical excitability beyond the duration of the train. This effect seems primarily due to cortical dysfacilitation. These results have implications on the therapeutic use of rTMS. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 107
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Abbott LF, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P220, DOI 10.1126/science.275.5297.221
  • [2] TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX WITH MAGNETIC STIMULATION - FACTORS AFFECTING ACCURACY AND REPRODUCIBILITY
    BRASILNETO, JP
    MCSHANE, LM
    FUHR, P
    HALLETT, M
    COHEN, LG
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (01): : 9 - 16
  • [3] OPTIMAL FOCAL TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC ACTIVATION OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX - EFFECTS OF COIL ORIENTATION, SHAPE OF THE INDUCED CURRENT PULSE, AND STIMULUS-INTENSITY
    BRASILNETO, JP
    COHEN, LG
    PANIZZA, M
    NILSSON, J
    ROTH, BJ
    HALLETT, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 9 (01) : 132 - 136
  • [4] Impaired inhibition in writer's cramp during voluntary muscle activation
    Chen, R
    Wassermann, EM
    Canos, M
    Hallett, M
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1997, 49 (04) : 1054 - 1059
  • [5] Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Chen, R
    Classen, J
    Gerloff, C
    Celnik, P
    Wassermann, EM
    Hallett, M
    Cohen, LG
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (05) : 1398 - 1403
  • [6] Di Lazzaro V, 1998, EXP BRAIN RES, V119, P265
  • [7] Variability in the amplitude of skeletal muscle responses to magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in man
    Ellaway, PH
    Davey, NJ
    Maskill, DW
    Rawlinson, SR
    Lewis, HS
    Anissimova, NP
    [J]. ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 109 (02): : 104 - 113
  • [8] Feinsod M, 1998, Depress Anxiety, V7, P65
  • [9] Imaging human intra-cerebral connectivity by PET during TMS
    Fox, P
    Ingham, R
    George, MS
    Mayberg, H
    Ingham, J
    Roby, J
    Martin, C
    Jerabek, P
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 1997, 8 (12) : 2787 - 2791
  • [10] Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials
    Gugino, LD
    Romero, JR
    Aglio, L
    Titone, D
    Ramirez, M
    Pascual-Leone, A
    Grimson, E
    Weisenfeld, N
    Kikinis, R
    Shenton, ME
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (10) : 1781 - 1792