Privacy and rationality - A survey

被引：211

作者：

Acquisti, A ^{[1
]}

Grossklags, J

机构：

[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, H John Heinz Sch Publ Policy & Management 3, Hamburg Hall,5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA

[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Informat Management & Syst, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA

来源：

PRIVACY AND TECHNOLOGIES OF IDENTITY: A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY CONVERSATION | 2006年

基金：

美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

privacy; rationality; experimental economics; consumer behavior;

D O I：

10.1007/0-387-28222-X_2

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

We present preliminary evidence from a survey of individual privacy attitudes, privacy behavior, and economic rationality. We discuss the theoretical approach that drives our analysis, the survey design, the empirical hypotheses, and our initial results. In particular, we present evidence of overconfidence in privacy assessments, lack of information prior to privacy-sensitive decisions, misconceptions about one's own exposure to privacy risks, bounded rationality, and hyperbolic discounting.

引用

页码：15 / 29

页数：15

共 38 条

[11] *FED TRAD COMM, 2000, PRIV ON LIN FAIR INF
[12] Fishbein Martin., 1975, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research
[13] Fisher Irving., 1930, The Theory of Interest
[14] Fox S., 2000, TRUST PRIVACY ONLINE
[15] GALZOLARI G, 2004, OPTIMALITY PRIVACY S
[16] HANN H, 2002, P 23 INT C INF SYS I
[17] HUBERMAN B, 2002, IN PRESS IEEE SECURI
[18] INTERACTIVE H, 2003, MOST PEOPLE PRIVACY
[19] Kahneman D., 2000, CHOICES VALUES FRAME
[20] Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting
Laibson, D
[J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) : 443 - 477

← 1 2 3 4 →