Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing

被引:667
作者
Cabrera, A
Collins, WC
Salgado, JF
机构
[1] Garvin Sch Int Management, Glendale, AZ 85306 USA
[2] Erasmus Univ, RSM, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Santiago Compostela, Dept Social Psychol, Santiago De Compostela 15706, Spain
关键词
knowledge management; knowledge management systems; knowledge sharing; personality; self-efficacy; openness to experience; perceived support from colleagues and supervisors; organizational commitment; job autonomy; perceptions of rewards;
D O I
10.1080/09585190500404614
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Knowledge management systems try to elicit and support the flow of ideas and experiences among groups of employees (sometimes referred to as knowledge communities). Whereas numerous information and communication systems have been developed to support such knowledge exchanges, practical applications have found that technology alone cannot ensure that knowledge will indeed be volunteered and exchanged, and whereas researchers and consultants alike have argued that culture and other human variables constitute key success factors, it is not clear what specific variables are at play, nor what management practices can affect those variables. This exploratory research investigates some of the psychological, organizational and system-related variables that may determine individual engagement in intra-organizational knowledge sharing. Results from a survey of 372 employees from a large multinational show that self-efficacy, openness to experience, perceived support from colleagues and supervisors and, to a lesser extent, organizational commitment, job autonomy, perceptions about the availability and quality of knowledge management systems, and perceptions of rewards associated with sharing knowledge, significantly predicted self-reports of participation in knowledge exchange.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 264
页数:20
相关论文
共 65 条
[41]  
MOWDAY RT, 1982, EMPLOYEE ORG LIKAGES
[42]   Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage [J].
Nahapiet, J ;
Ghoshal, S .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (02) :242-266
[43]  
Nanda A., 1996, ORG LEARNING COMPETI
[44]   INVESTIGATION OF THE FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE EMPLOYEES PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES [J].
NOE, RA ;
WILK, SL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (02) :291-302
[46]   RATERS RATEES AND RANDOMNESS IN PERSONALITY STRUCTURE [J].
NORMAN, WT ;
GOLDBERG, LR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1966, 4 (06) :681-&
[47]   ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ATTACHMENT - THE EFFECTS OF COMPLIANCE, IDENTIFICATION, AND INTERNALIZATION ON PRO-SOCIAL BEHAVIOR [J].
OREILLY, C ;
CHATMAN, J .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 71 (03) :492-499
[48]   Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality [J].
Parker, SK ;
Sprigg, CA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 84 (06) :925-939
[49]   Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions [J].
Parker, SK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (06) :835-852
[50]   From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy [J].
Parker, SK .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2000, 49 (03) :447-469