Influence of the needle bore size on platelet count and routine coagulation testing

被引:52
作者
Lippi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Salvagno, Gian Luca [1 ]
Montagnana, Martina [1 ]
Poli, Giovanni [1 ]
Guidi, Gian Cesare [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Osped Policlin GB Rossi, Ist Chim & Microscopia Clin, Dipartimento Sci Morfol Biomed,Sez Chim & Microsc, I-37134 Verona, Italy
关键词
coagulation testing; platelet count; preanalytic variability;
D O I
10.1097/01.mbc.0000245300.10387.ca
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The phlebotomy technique, particularly the use of small-bore needles, may influence the reliability of coagulation testing and platelet count. Routine coagulation tests were assayed in blood specimens collected from 22 consecutive patients in three separate, sequential phlebotomies, using butterfly devices with different needle sizes. Test results of samples collected with 23 and 25 G needles were compared with those obtained with the currently recommended 21 G needle. Although both the prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time displayed a trend towards lower values employing the smaller 23 and 25 G needles, results did not differ significantly from the reference 21 G needle specimen, with the exceptions of D-dimer (25 G versus 21 G needle, 186 +/- 70 versus 178 +/- 66/ ml, P < 0.01) and platelet count (23 G versus 21 G needle, 246 +/- 55 versus 254 +/- 56 X 10(-3)/l, P < 0.01; 25 G versus 21 G needle, 240 +/- 55 versus 254 +/- 56 X 10(-3)/l, p < 0.01). None of the mean biases recorded for the parameters was clinically meaningful, nor did they exceed the current desirable analytical quality specifications for desirable bias. Results of the present investigation suggest that, when a proper technique is used and within certain limitations, butterfly devices with small-bore needles may be a reliable alternative to draw venous blood for platelet count and coagulation testing.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 561
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Adcock DM, 1997, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V107, P105
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, H15A3 NCCLS
[3]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[4]   Erroneous D-dimer result on a paediatric citrated specimen [J].
Carroll, PA ;
Ray, MJ .
BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 1996, 7 (04) :502-502
[5]  
DEACON B, 2006, J ANXIETY DISORD
[6]   Factors affecting hemolysis rates in blood samples drawn from newly placed IV sites in the emergency department [J].
Dugan, L ;
Leech, L ;
Speroni, KG ;
Corriher, J .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 2005, 31 (04) :338-345
[7]  
Eckman Mark H, 2003, Ann Intern Med, V138, pW15
[8]  
Ernst Dennis J, 2002, Home Healthc Nurse, V20, P151
[9]   Preanalytical aspects of routine coagulation measurements [J].
Horsti, J .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2001, 61 (02) :167-168
[10]   Evaluation of platelet function under high shear condition in the small-sized collagen bead column [J].
Kaneko, M ;
Takafuta, T ;
Cuyun-Lira, O ;
Satoh, K ;
Arai, M ;
Yatomi, Y ;
Ozaki, Y .
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2005, 146 (02) :64-75