Budding yeast Bub2 is localized at spindle pole bodies and activates the mitotic checkpoint via a different pathway from Mad2

被引:149
作者
Fraschini, R [1 ]
Formenti, E [1 ]
Lucchini, G [1 ]
Piatti, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Dipartimento Genet & Biol Microrganismi, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
budding yeast; Bub2; mitotic check-point; anaphase; anaphase-promoting complex;
D O I
10.1083/jcb.145.5.979
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The mitotic checkpoint blocks cell cycle progression before anaphase in case of mistakes in the alignment of chromosomes on the mitotic spindle. In budding yeast, the Mad1, 2, 3, and Bub1, 2, 3 proteins mediate this arrest. Vertebrate homologues of Mad1, 2, 3, and Bub1, 3 bind to unattached kinetochores and prevent progression through mitosis by inhibiting Cdc20/APC-mediated proteolysis of anaphase inhibitors, like Pds1 and B-type cyclins. We investigated the role of Bub2 in budding yeast mitotic checkpoint. The following observations indicate that Bub2 and Mad1, 2 probably activate the checkpoint via different pathways: (a) unlike the other Mad and Bub proteins, Bub2 localizes at the spindle pole body (SPB) throughout the cell cycle; (b) the effect of concomitant lack of Mad1 or Mad2 and Bub2 is additive, since nocodazole-treated mad1 bub2 and mad2 bub2 double mutants rereplicate DNA more rapidly and efficiently than either single mutant; (c) cell cycle progression of bub2 cells in the presence of nocodazole requires the Cdc26 APC subunit, which, conversely, is not required for mad2 cells in the same conditions. Altogether, our data suggest that activation of the mitotic checkpoint blocks progression through mitosis by independent and partially redundant mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 991
页数:13
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] REGULATION OF P34CDC28 TYROSINE PHOSPHORYLATION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR ENTRY INTO MITOSIS IN SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE
    AMON, A
    SURANA, U
    MUROFF, I
    NASMYTH, K
    [J]. NATURE, 1992, 355 (6358) : 368 - 371
  • [2] Fission yeast bub1 is a mitotic centromere protein essential for the spindle checkpoint and the preservation of correct ploidy through mitosis
    Bernard, P
    Hardwick, K
    Javerzat, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1998, 143 (07) : 1775 - 1787
  • [3] Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers
    Cahill, DP
    Lengauer, C
    Yu, J
    Riggins, GJ
    Willson, JKV
    Markowitz, SD
    Kinzler, KW
    Vogelstein, B
    [J]. NATURE, 1998, 392 (6673) : 300 - 303
  • [4] MICROINJECTION OF MITOTIC CELLS WITH THE 3F3/2 ANTI-PHOSPHOEPITOPE ANTIBODY DELAYS THE ONSET OF ANAPHASE
    CAMPBELL, MS
    GORBSKY, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1995, 129 (05) : 1195 - 1204
  • [5] The Polo-related kinase Cdc5 activates and is destroyed by the mitotic cyclin destruction machinery in S. cerevisiae
    Charles, JF
    Jespersen, SL
    Tinker-Kulberg, RL
    Hwang, L
    Szidon, A
    Morgan, DO
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (09) : 497 - 507
  • [6] Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores
    Chen, RH
    Shevchenko, A
    Mann, M
    Murray, AW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1998, 143 (02) : 283 - 295
  • [7] Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores
    Chen, RH
    Waters, JC
    Salmon, ED
    Murray, AW
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1996, 274 (5285) : 242 - 246
  • [8] An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast
    Ciosk, R
    Zachariae, W
    Michaelis, C
    Shevchenko, A
    Mann, M
    Nasmyth, K
    [J]. CELL, 1998, 93 (06) : 1067 - 1076
  • [9] Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p
    CohenFix, O
    Peters, JM
    Kirschner, MW
    Koshland, D
    [J]. GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 10 (24) : 3081 - 3093
  • [10] S-PHASE-PROMOTING CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASES PREVENT RE-REPLICATION BY INHIBITING THE TRANSITION OF REPLICATION ORIGINS TO A PRE-REPLICATIVE STATE
    DAHMANN, C
    DIFFLEY, JFX
    NASMYTH, KA
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1995, 5 (11) : 1257 - 1269