The association between obesity and screening mammography accuracy

被引:77
作者
Elmore, JG
Carney, PA
Abraham, LA
Barlow, WE
Egger, JR
Fosse, JS
Cutter, GR
Hendrick, E
D'Orsi, CJ
Paliwal, P
Taplin, SH
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Harborview Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Ctr Hlth Studies, Grp Hlth Cooperat, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Dartmouth Coll Sch Med, Dept Community & Family Med, Lebanon, NH USA
[4] Univ Nevada, Sch Med, Ctr Res Design & Stat Methods, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Lynn Sage Comprehens Breast Canc Ctr, Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Breast Imaging Ctr, Emory Hlth Care Serv, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Univ Connecticut, Dept Stat, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.164.10.1140
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Obesity is increasing among American women, especially as they age. The influence of obesity on the accuracy of screening mammography has not been studied extensively. Methods: We analyzed 100 622 screening mammography examinations performed on members of a non-profit health plan. The relationship between body mass index (weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) and measures of screening accuracy was assessed. Body mass index was categorized as underweight or normal weight (<25), overweight (25-29), obesity class I (30-34), and obesity classes II to III (greater than or equal to35). Results: Compared with underweight or normal weight women, overweight and obese women were more likely to be recalled for additional tests after adjusting for important covariates, including age and breast density (overweight odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.23); obesity class I OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.19-1.35; obesity classes II-III OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.41). As body mass index increased, women were more likely to have lower specificity (overweight OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.90; obesity class I OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84; and obesity classes II-III OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.82). No statistically significant differences were noted in sensitivity. Adjusted receiver operating characteristic analysis showed statistically significant improvement in the area under the curve (AUC) for underweight or normal weight women (AUC=0.941) vs overweight women (AUC=0.916, P=.02) and under-weight or normal weight women vs obesity classes II and III women (AUC=0.904, P=.02). Conclusions: Obese women had more than a 20% increased risk of having false-positive mammography results compared with underweight and normal weight women, although sensitivity was unchanged. Achieving a normal weight may improve screening mammography performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1140 / 1147
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice [J].
Berns, EA ;
Hendrick, RE ;
Cutter, GR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) :830-834
[2]   The relationship of anthropometric measures to radiological features of the breast in premenopausal women [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Lockwood, GA ;
Byng, JW ;
Little, LE ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Tritchler, DL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 78 (09) :1233-1238
[3]   Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults [J].
Calle, EE ;
Thun, MJ ;
Petrelli, JM ;
Rodriguez, C ;
Heath, CW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (15) :1097-1105
[4]   Factors associated with interval adherence to mammography screening in a population-based sample of New Hampshire women [J].
Carney, PA ;
Harwood, BG ;
Weiss, JE ;
Eliassen, MS ;
Goodrich, ME .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (02) :219-227
[5]   A CLINICALLY EFFECTIVE BREAST-CANCER SCREENING-PROGRAM CAN BE COST-EFFECTIVE, TOO [J].
CARTER, AP ;
THOMPSON, RS ;
BOURDEAU, RV ;
ANDENES, J ;
MUSTIN, H ;
STRALEY, H .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1987, 16 (01) :19-34
[6]  
Elmore JG, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1373
[7]  
Ernster VL, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1546
[8]   Body weight and cancer screening among women [J].
Fontaine, KR ;
Heo, M ;
Allison, DB .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE, 2001, 10 (05) :463-470
[9]   Adverse effects of increased body weight on quantitative measures of mammographic image quality [J].
Guest, AR ;
Helvie, MA ;
Chan, HP ;
Hadjiiski, LM ;
Bailey, JE ;
Roubidoux, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (03) :805-810
[10]  
Hall IJ, 2000, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V151, P754, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010275