The domain specificity and generality of belief bias:: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill

被引:151
作者
Sá, WC
West, RF
Stanovich, KE
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Ontario Inst Studies Educ, Dept Human Dev & Appl Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 1V6, Canada
[2] James Madison Univ, Dept Psychol, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.497
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The domain specificity and generality of belief-biased reasoning was examined across a height judgment task and a syllogistic reasoning task that differed greatly in cognitive requirements. Moderate correlations between belief-bias indices on these 2 tasks falsified an extreme form of the domain specificity view of critical thinking skills. Two measures of cognitive ability and 2 measures of cognitive decontextualization skill were positively correlated with belief bias in a height judgment task where prior knowledge accurately reflected an aspect of the environment and negatively correlated with belief bias in a height judgment task where prior knowledge was incongruent with the environment. Likewise, cognitive ability was associated with skill at resisting the influence of prior knowledge in the syllogistic reasoning task. Participants high in cognitive ability were able to flexibly use prior knowledge, depending upon its efficacy in a particular environment. They were more Likely to project a relationship when it reflected a useful cue, but they were also less likely to project a prior belief when the belief was inefficacious.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 510
页数:14
相关论文
共 106 条
[31]  
ERWIN TD, 1983, J COLL STUDENT DEV, V24, P6
[32]  
ERWIN TD, 1981, MANUAL SCALE INTELLE
[33]  
Evans J.S. B., 1996, RATIONALITY REASONIN
[34]   REASONING, DECISION-MAKING AND RATIONALITY [J].
EVANS, JSBT ;
OVER, DE ;
MANKTELOW, KI .
COGNITION, 1993, 49 (1-2) :165-187
[35]   ON THE CONFLICT BETWEEN LOGIC AND BELIEF IN SYLLOGISTIC REASONING [J].
EVANS, JST ;
BARSTON, JL ;
POLLARD, P .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1983, 11 (03) :295-306
[36]   THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE PREMISES - ASSUMPTION-BASED OR BELIEF-BASED REASONING [J].
GEORGE, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 86 :93-111
[37]   THE SOCIAL-CONTEXT OF REASONING - CONVERSATIONAL INFERENCE AND RATIONAL JUDGMENT [J].
HILTON, DJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 118 (02) :248-271
[38]   ASSESSMENT OF AN INFORMATION INTEGRATION ACCOUNT OF CONTINGENCY JUDGMENT WITH EXAMINATION OF SUBJECTIVE CELL IMPORTANCE AND METHOD OF INFORMATION PRESENTATION [J].
KAO, SF ;
WASSERMAN, EA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (06) :1363-1386
[39]   Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues [J].
Kardash, CM ;
Scholes, RJ .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 88 (02) :260-271
[40]   Bias in adolescents' everyday reasoning and its relationship with intellectual ability, personal theories, and self-serving motivation [J].
Klaczynski, P .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 33 (02) :273-283