Carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan as a preparative regimen for allogeneic transplantation for high-risk malignant lymphoma

被引:40
作者
Przepiorka, D
van Besien, K
Khouri, I
Hagemeister, F
Samuels, B
Folloder, J
Ueno, NT
Molldrem, J
Mehra, R
Körbling, M
Giralt, S
Gajewski, J
Donato, M
Cleary, K
Claxton, D
Braunschweig, I
Andersson, B
Anderlini, P
Champlin, R
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Blood & Marrow Transplantat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Lymphoma, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
allogeneic transplantation; BEAM; lymphoma;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010369
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The combination of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (BEAM) is an effective autologous transplantation preparative regimen for lymphoma and has little toxicity, but the feasibility and tolerance of BEAM as a preparative regimen for allogeneic transplantation has not been established. Patients and methods: Thirty adults with primary refractory or recurrent intermediate- or low-grade lymphoma were treated on a prospective phase II study with carmustine 300 mg/m(2) i.v. day -6, etoposide 200 mg/m(2) i.v. followed by cytarabine 200 mg/m(2) i.v. twice daily days -5 to -2, melphalan 140 mg/m(2) i.v. day -1, and marrow or blood stem cells from an HLA-identical donor on day 0. Tacrolimus and methotrexate were used to prevent graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD). Results: Median time from transplantation was 20 mos (range 6-32 months). Median maximal regimen-related toxicity grade was 2, and four patients (13%) had a grade 3-4 regimen-related toxicity. Two patients had idiopathic interstitial pneumonitis. One patient had primary graft failure, and a second had autologous reconstitution documented at three months posttransplant. Grades 2-4 acute GVHD occurred in 31%, grades 3-4 in 16%, and chronic GVHD in 54%. Day-100 survival was 70%. Twenty-three patients achieved a complete response. The two-year relapse rate was 23%, survival was 48%, and disease-free survival (DFS) was 42%. Conclusions: BEAM supports engraftment of allogeneic transplants and is a tolerable preparative regimen for allogeneic transplantation for lymphoma.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 532
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients who relapse after autologous transplantation [J].
Tsai, T ;
Goodman, S ;
Saez, R ;
Schiller, G ;
Adkins, D ;
Callander, N ;
Wolff, S ;
Freytes, CO .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 20 (10) :859-863
[42]  
van Besien K, 1997, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, V3, P150
[43]  
van Besien K, 1998, BLOOD, V92, P1832
[44]  
VANBESIEN K, 1995, BONE MARROW TRANSPL, V15, P321
[45]   Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for poor-prognosis lymphoma: Response, toxicity, and survival depend on disease histology [J].
vanBesien, KW ;
Mehra, RC ;
Giralt, SA ;
Kantarjian, HM ;
Pugh, WC ;
Khouri, IF ;
Moon, Y ;
Williams, P ;
Andersson, BS ;
Przepiorka, D ;
McCarthy, PL ;
Gajewski, JL ;
Deisseroth, AB ;
Cabanillas, FF ;
Champlin, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 100 (03) :299-307
[46]   ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FOR REFRACTORY AND RECURRENT LOW-GRADE LYMPHOMA - THE CASE FOR AGGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT [J].
VANBESIEN, KW ;
KHOURI, IF ;
GIRALT, SA ;
MCCARTHY, P ;
MEHRA, R ;
ANDERSSON, BS ;
PRZEPIORKA, D ;
GAJEWSKI, JL ;
BELLARE, N ;
NATH, R ;
ROMAGUERA, JE ;
MCLAUGHLIN, P ;
KORBLING, M ;
DEISSEROTH, AB ;
CABANILLAS, FF ;
CHAMPLIN, RE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (05) :1096-1102
[47]   Allogeneic versus autologous bone marrow transplantation for refractory and recurrent low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [J].
Verdonck, LF ;
Dekker, AW ;
Lokhorst, HM ;
Petersen, EJ ;
Nieuwenhuis, HK .
BLOOD, 1997, 90 (10) :4201-4205
[48]  
Vey N, 1996, BONE MARROW TRANSPL, V18, P495
[49]   Intensified and high-dose chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and autologous stem-cell transplantation support as first-line therapy in high-risk diffuse large-cell lymphoma [J].
Vitolo, U ;
Cortellazzo, S ;
Liberati, AM ;
Freilone, R ;
Falda, M ;
Bertini, M ;
Botto, B ;
Cinieri, S ;
Levis, A ;
Locatelli, F ;
Lovisone, E ;
Marmont, F ;
Pizzuti, M ;
Rossi, A ;
Viero, P ;
Barbui, T ;
Grignani, F ;
Resegotti, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (02) :491-498
[50]  
YAM P, 1987, AM J HUM GENET, V41, P867