Sometimes unfair procedures have nice aspects: On the psychology of the fair process effect

被引:83
作者
van den Bos, K
Bruins, J
Wilke, HAM
Dronkert, E
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Social & Org Psychol, NL-2300 RB Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Essex, Dept Psychol, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.324
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article focuses on the psychology of the fair process effect (the frequently replicated finding that perceived procedural fairness positively affects people's reactions). It is argued that when people receive an unfavorable outcome, they may start looking for causes that explain why they received this outcome. Furthermore, the authors propose that unfair procedures provide an opportunity to attribute one's unfavorable outcome to external causes, whereas fair procedures do not. As a consequence, people may react more negatively after fair as opposed to unfair procedures (a reversal of the fair process effect). The findings of 3 experiments corroborate the authors' line of reasoning and show that if unfavorable outcomes strongly instigate attribution-seeking processes, a reversal of the fair process effect indeed can be found. In this way, these findings show that sometimes unfair procedures have nice aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 336
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
[41]   Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next [J].
vandenBos, K ;
Vermunt, R ;
Wilke, HAM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 72 (01) :95-104
[42]   How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect [J].
vandenBos, K ;
Lind, EA ;
Vermunt, R ;
Wilke, HAM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 72 (05) :1034-1046
[43]  
vandenBos K, 1996, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V26, P411, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199605)26:3<411::AID-EJSP766>3.0.CO
[44]  
2-2
[45]  
VANDENBOS K, IN PRESS J EXPT SOCI
[46]  
Vermunt R., 1996, SOCIAL JUSTICE RES, V9, P109, DOI [10.1007/BF02198075, DOI 10.1007/BF02198075]
[47]   REACTIONS OF PARTICIPANTS AND OBSERVERS TO MODES OF ADJUDICATION [J].
WALKER, L ;
LATOUR, S ;
LIND, EA ;
THIBAUT, J .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 4 (04) :295-310
[48]   SPONTANEOUS CAUSAL THINKING [J].
WEINER, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1985, 97 (01) :74-84