Nitric oxide in the uteroplacental, fetoplacental, and peripheral circulations in preeclampsia

被引:71
作者
Norris, LA [1 ]
Higgins, JR
Darling, MRN
Walshe, JJ
Bonnar, J
机构
[1] St James Hosp, Trinity Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Dublin 8, Ireland
[2] Rotunda Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00007-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Altered production of nitric oxide by the vascular endothelium may influence the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. The aim of this study was to measure circulating levels of nitric oxide metabolites (nitrites) in the uteroplacental, fetoplacental, and peripheral circulation of preeclamptic pregnancies compared-with normotensive controls. Methods: Fifteen women with preeclampsia were compared with 16 women with normotensive pregnancies. At cesarean, blood samples were taken from the uterine vein draining the placental site, the umbilical vein, and the antecubital vein after delivery of the baby but before delivery of the placenta. Plasma nitrites were measured using the Greiss reaction after conversion of plasma nitrates to nitrites using nitrate reductase. Results: Nitric oxide metabolites were higher in the uteroplacental (P < .01), fetoplacental (P < .001), and peripheral (P < .02) circulations in samples from preeclamptic pregnancies compared with control pregnancies. In samples from the fetoplacental circulation only, nitric oxide metabolite levels were negatively correlated with gestational age (r = -.489, P < .01) and birth weight (r = -.544, P < .004). Nitric oxide metabolite levels were not significantly correlated with blood pressure, placental weight, or maternal age. Conclusion: In established preeclampsia, production of nitric oxide was higher in the uteroplacental, fetoplacental, and peripheral circulation than in normotensive pregnancies. This increase may be part of a compensatory mechanism to offset the pathologic effects of preeclampsia. (Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:958-63. (C) 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.)
引用
收藏
页码:958 / 963
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]  
MORRIS NH, 1995, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V102, P711
[22]  
MYATT L, 1995, J SOC GYNECOL INVEST, V2, P259
[23]   Plasma nitric oxide levels in pregnant patients with preeclampsia and essential hypertension [J].
Nobunaga, T ;
Tokugawa, Y ;
Hashimoto, K ;
Kimura, T ;
Matsuzaki, N ;
Nitta, Y ;
Fujita, T ;
Kidoguchi, K ;
Azuma, C ;
Saji, F .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1996, 41 (03) :189-193
[24]   PLATELET ACTIVATION IN NORMOTENSIVE AND HYPERTENSIVE PREGNANCIES COMPLICATED BY INTRAUTERINE GROWTH-RETARDATION [J].
NORRIS, LA ;
SHEPPARD, BL ;
BURKE, G ;
BONNAR, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (03) :209-214
[25]   A NITRIC-OXIDE DONOR IMPROVES UTERINE ARTERY DIASTOLIC BLOOD-FLOW IN NORMAL EARLY-PREGNANCY AND IN WOMEN AT HIGH-RISK OF PREECLAMPSIA [J].
RAMSAY, B ;
DEBELDER, A ;
CAMPBELL, S ;
MONCADA, S ;
MARTIN, JF .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1994, 24 (01) :76-78
[26]   Nitric oxide synthase activities in human myometrium and villous trophoblast throughout pregnancy [J].
Ramsay, B ;
Sooranna, SR ;
Johnson, MR .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (02) :249-253
[27]   PREECLAMPSIA - AN ENDOTHELIAL-CELL DISORDER [J].
ROBERTS, JM ;
TAYLOR, RN ;
MUSCI, TJ ;
RODGERS, GM ;
HUBEL, CA ;
MCLAUGHLIN, MK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 161 (05) :1200-1204
[28]   Nitric oxide synthase in human placenta and umbilical cord from normal, intrauterine growth-retarded and pre-eclamptic pregnancies [J].
Rutherford, RAD ;
McCarthy, A ;
Sullivan, MHF ;
Elder, MG ;
Polak, JM ;
Wharton, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 116 (08) :3099-3109
[29]   THE ROLE OF NITRIC-OXIDE IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF PREECLAMPSIA [J].
SELIGMAN, SP ;
BUYON, JP ;
CLANCY, RM ;
YOUNG, BK ;
ABRAMSON, SB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (04) :944-948
[30]   AN ULTRASTRUCTURAL-STUDY OF UTEROPLACENTAL SPIRAL ARTERIES IN HYPERTENSIVE AND NORMOTENSIVE PREGNANCY AND FETAL GROWTH-RETARDATION [J].
SHEPPARD, BL ;
BONNAR, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1981, 88 (07) :695-705