Renal arterial resistive index is associated with severe histological changes and poor renal outcome during chronic kidney disease

被引:83
作者
Bige, Naike [1 ]
Levy, Pierre Patrick [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Callard, Patrice [5 ]
Faintuch, Jean-Manuel [6 ]
Chigot, Valerie [6 ]
Jousselin, Virginie [1 ]
Ronco, Pierre [1 ,7 ,8 ]
Boffa, Jean-Jacques [1 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Hop Tenon, AP HP, Dept Nephrol, F-75020 Paris, France
[2] Hop Tenon, AP HP, Publ Hlth Dept, F-75020 Paris, France
[3] INSERM, U707, F-75012 Paris, France
[4] Univ Paris 06, UMR S 707, F-75012 Paris, France
[5] Hop Tenon, AP HP, Dept Pathol, F-75020 Paris, France
[6] Hop Tenon, AP HP, Dept Radiol, F-75020 Paris, France
[7] INSERM, U702, F-75020 Paris, France
[8] Univ Paris 06, UMR S 702, F-75012 Paris, France
关键词
Chronic kidney disease; Arteriosclerosis; Fibrosis; Renal doppler; TARGET ORGAN DAMAGE; RESISTANCE INDEX; DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY; PULSATILITY INDEX; PROGRESSION; THERAPY; MARKER; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; HYPERTENSION; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2369-13-139
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a growing public health problem and end stage renal disease (ESRD) represents a large human and economic burden. It is important to identify patients at high risk of ESRD. In order to determine whether renal Doppler resistive index (RI) may discriminate those patients, we analyzed whether RI was associated with identified prognosis factors of CKD, in particular histological findings, and with renal outcome. Methods: RI was measured in the 48 hours before renal biopsy in 58 CKD patients. Clinical and biological data were collected prospectively at inclusion. Arteriosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis were quantitatively assessed on renal biopsy in a blinded fashion. MDRD eGFR at 18 months was collected for 35 (60%) patients. Renal function decline was defined as a decrease in eGFR from baseline of at least 5 mL/min/ 1.73 m(2)/year or need for chronic renal replacement therapy. Pearson's correlation, Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests were used for analysis of quantitative and qualitative variables respectively. Kaplan Meier analysis was realized to determine renal survival according to RI value using the log-rank test. Multiple logistic regression was performed including variables with p < 0.20 in univariate analysis. Results: Most patients had glomerulonephritis (82%). Median age was 46 years [21-87], eGFR 59 mL/min/ 1.73m(2) [5-130], percentage of interstitial fibrosis 10% [0-90], glomerulosclerosis 13% [0-96] and RI 0.63 [0.31-1.00]. RI increased with age (r = 0.435, p = 0.0063), pulse pressure (r = 0.303, p = 0.022), renal atrophy (r = -0.275, p = 0.038) and renal dysfunction (r = -0.402, p = 0.0018). Patients with arterial intima/media ratio >= 1 (p = 0.032), interstitial fibrosis > 20% (p = 0.014) and renal function decline (p = 0.0023) had higher RI. Patients with baseline RI >= 0.65 had a poorer renal outcome than those with baseline RI < 0.65 (p = 0.0005). In multiple logistic regression, RI >= 0.65 was associated with accelerated renal function decline independently of baseline eGFR and proteinuria/creatininuria ratio (OR=13.04 [1.984-85.727], p = 0.0075). Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive and predictive negative values of RI >= 0.65 for renal function decline at 18 months were respectively 77%, 86%, 71% and 82%. Conclusions: Our results suggest that RI >= 0.65 is associated with severe interstitial fibrosis and arteriosclerosis and renal function decline. Thus, RI may contribute to identify patients at high risk of ESRD who may benefit from nephroprotective treatments.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   INTRARENAL ARTERIAL DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH NONOBSTRUCTIVE RENAL-DISEASE - CORRELATION OF RESISTIVE INDEX WITH BIOPSY FINDINGS [J].
PLATT, JF ;
ELLIS, JH ;
RUBIN, JM ;
DIPIETRO, MA ;
SEDMAN, AB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 154 (06) :1223-1227
[32]   Increased renal resistive index in patients with essential hypertension: a marker of target organ damage [J].
Pontremoli, R ;
Viazzi, F ;
Martinoli, C ;
Ravera, M ;
Nicolella, C ;
Berruti, V ;
Leoncini, G ;
Ruello, N ;
Zagami, P ;
Bezante, GP ;
Derchi, LE ;
Deferrari, G .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 14 (02) :360-365
[33]   Use of Doppler ultrasonography to predict the outcome of therapy for renal-artery stenosis [J].
Radermacher, J ;
Chavan, A ;
Bleck, J ;
Vitzthum, A ;
Stoess, B ;
Gebel, MJ ;
Galanski, M ;
Koch, KM ;
Haller, H .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (06) :410-417
[34]   Renal resistance index and progression of renal disease [J].
Radermacher, J ;
Ellis, S ;
Haller, H .
HYPERTENSION, 2002, 39 (02) :699-703
[35]   The renal arterial resistance index and renal allograft survival [J].
Radermacher, J ;
Mengel, M ;
Ellis, S ;
Stuht, S ;
Hiss, M ;
Schwarz, A ;
Eisenberger, U ;
Burg, M ;
Luft, FC ;
Gwinner, W ;
Haller, H .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (02) :115-124
[36]   Renal resistive index in addition to low-grade albuminuria complements screening for target organ damage in therapy-resistant hypertension [J].
Raff, Ulrike ;
Schmidt, Bernhard M. W. ;
Schwab, Johannes ;
Schwarz, Thomas K. ;
Achenbach, Stephan ;
Baer, Ingrid ;
Schmieder, Roland E. .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2010, 28 (03) :608-614
[37]  
Rivolta R, 2000, J NEPHROL, V13, P110
[38]   Determinants of Resistive Index Shortly after Transplantation: Independent Relationship with Delayed Graft Function [J].
Rodrigo, E. ;
Lopez-Rasines, G. ;
Ruiz, J. C. ;
Lastra, P. ;
Gomez-Dermitt, V. ;
Gomez-Alamillo, C. ;
Gonzalez-Cotorruelo, J. ;
Calabia, A. ;
Arias, M. .
NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 114 (03) :C178-C186
[39]   Early assessment of renal resistance index after kidney transplant can help predict long-term renal function [J].
Saracino, Angelo ;
Santarsia, Giovanni ;
Latorraca, Angela ;
Gaudiano, Vito .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 21 (10) :2916-2920
[40]   Value of resistive index in patients with clinical diabetic nephropathy [J].
Sari, A ;
Dinc, H ;
Zibandeh, A ;
Telatar, M ;
Gümele, HR .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (11) :718-721