Fitness cost of LINE-1 (L1) activity in humans

被引:102
作者
Boissinot, Stephane
Davis, Jerel
Entezam, Ali
Petrov, Dimitri
Furano, Anthony V.
机构
[1] NIDDKD, Mol & Cellular Biol Lab, Sect Genom Struct & Funct, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] CUNY Queens Coll, Dept Biol, Flushing, NY 11367 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Sci Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
genetics; retrotransposon;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0603334103
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The self-replicating LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon family is the dominant retrotransposon family in mammals and has generated 30-40% of their genomes. Active L1 families are present in modern mammals but the important question of whether these currently active families affect the genetic fitness of their hosts has not been addressed. This issue is of particular relevance to humans as Homo sapiens contains the active L1 Tal1 subfamily of the human specific Ta (L1Pa1) L1 family. Although DNA insertions generated by the Tall subfamily can cause genetic defects in current humans, these are relatively rare, and it is not known whether Ta1-generated inserts or any other property of Ta1 elements have been sufficiently deleterious to reduce the fitness of humans. Here we show that full-length (FL) Ta1 elements, but not the truncated Ta1 elements or SINE (Alu) insertions generated by Ta1 activity, were subject to negative selection. Thus, one or more properties unique to FL L1 elements constitute a genetic burden for modern humans. We also found that the FL Ta1 elements became more deleterious as the expansion of Ta1 has proceeded. Because this expansion is ongoing, the Ta1 subfamily almost certainly continues to decrease the fitness of modern humans.
引用
收藏
页码:9590 / 9594
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Biemont C, 1997, GENETICS, V147, P1997
[2]   L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon evolution and amplification in recent human history [J].
Boissinot, S ;
Chevret, P ;
Furano, AV .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2000, 17 (06) :915-928
[3]   The Insertional history of an active family of L1 retrotransposons in humans [J].
Boissinot, S ;
Entezam, A ;
Young, L ;
Munson, PJ ;
Furano, AV .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2004, 14 (07) :1221-1231
[4]   Selection against deleterious LINE-1-containing loci in the human lineage [J].
Boissinot, S ;
Entezam, A ;
Furano, AV .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2001, 18 (06) :926-935
[5]   Hot L1s account for the bulk of retrotransposition in the human population [J].
Brouha, B ;
Schustak, J ;
Badge, RM ;
Lutz-Prigget, S ;
Farley, AH ;
Moran, JV ;
Kazazian, HH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (09) :5280-5285
[6]   Mechanisms regulating the copy numbers of six LTR retrotransposons in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Carr, M ;
Soloway, JR ;
Robinson, TE ;
Brookfield, JFY .
CHROMOSOMA, 2002, 110 (08) :511-518
[7]   THE POPULATION-DYNAMICS OF TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS [J].
CHARLESWORTH, B ;
CHARLESWORTH, D .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 1983, 42 (01) :1-27
[8]   THE POPULATION-GENETICS OF DROSOPHILA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS [J].
CHARLESWORTH, B ;
LANGLEY, CH .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 1989, 23 :251-287
[9]   THE EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF REPETITIVE DNA IN EUKARYOTES [J].
CHARLESWORTH, B ;
SNIEGOWSKI, P ;
STEPHAN, W .
NATURE, 1994, 371 (6494) :215-220
[10]   Factors affecting ectopic gene conversion in mice [J].
Cooper, DM ;
Schimenti, KJ ;
Schimenti, JC .
MAMMALIAN GENOME, 1998, 9 (05) :355-360