Rapamycin at six years can exhibit normal renal function without proteinuria or neoplasia after renal transplantation.: A single-center experience

Currently, long-term experience with Rapamune (RAPA) after renal transplantation is scarce. We present our experience with RAPA in patients who were included in clinical trials. Between 1996 and 1999, 27 renal transplant patients received RAPA alone or in combination with cyclosporine (CyA). We study 15 of them (9 males, 6 females; mean age 36 years) who are currently functioning with a mean follow-up of 6 years (range, 5.2-8 years). The presence of delayed graft function was 40% and acute rejection 26.6%, all of them controlled with steroids. Notably, no patients experienced an acute rejection episode after the first year. Among 15 patients, 12 received steroids, RAPA and CyA; and 3 received steroids, RAPA, azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for immunosuppression. At the end of follow-up, the situation was the opposite: 12 patients received steroids (2.5-5 mg/d) and RAPA associated with or without A-ZA/MMF, and 3 were maintained with steroids, RAPA and CyA. Renal function was excellent in the entire group: mean SCr 1.1 mg/dL (range, 0.7-1.8) with mean RAPA blood levels (HPLC) of 11 ng/dL (range 8-16). Hyperlipidemia was universal with all patients (100%) receiving statins maintaining acceptable levels of cholesterol (mean 209 +/- 28 mg/dL) and tryglycerides (mean 154 +/- 76 mg/dL). Arterial hypertension present in 12 of 15 (80%) patients was controlled with a mean of 1.5 drugs. Notably, no patient presented with proteinuria, neoplasia, posttransplant diabetes, or cardiovascular events. In conclusion, these single-center results suggest that Rapamune may be useful in the long-run after renal transplantation. The presence of normal renal function and the absence of proteinuria and neoplasia in these renal transplant patients may have important clinical implications.