A SURVEY AND COMPARISON OF PEER-TO-PEER OVERLAY NETWORK SCHEMES

被引：620

作者：

Lua, Eng Keong ^{[3
,4
,5
]}

Crowcroft, Jon ^{[3
,6
,7
,8
,9
,10
,11
]}

Pias, Marcelo ^{[12
]}

Sharma, Ravi ^{[1
,13
,14
]}

Lim, Steven ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore 639798, Singapore

[2] Microsoft Asia, Beijing, Peoples R China

[3] Univ Cambridge, Comp Lab, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England

[4] Intel Res Lab, Cambridge, England

[5] Infocomm Dev Author Singapore, Informat Infrastruct Dev Div, Singapore, Singapore

[6] UCL, Dept Comp Sci, London, England

[7] ACM, New York, NY USA

[8] British Comp Soc, London, England

[9] IEE, Piscataway, NJ USA

[10] Royal Acad Engn, London, England

[11] IEEE, Piscataway, NJ USA

[12] Intel Labs, Cambridge, England

[13] IBM Global Serv, Armonk, NY USA

[14] Deutsch Telekom Asia, Multimedia Competency Ctr, Singapore, Singapore

来源：

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS | 2005年 / 7卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1109/COMST.2005.1610546

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

Over the Internet today, computing and communications environments are significantly more complex and chaotic than classical distributed systems, lacking any centralized organization or hierarchical control. There has been much interest in emerging Peer-to-Peer (P2P) network overlays because they provide a good substrate for creating large-scale data sharing, content distribution, and application-level multicast applications. These P2P overlay networks attempt to provide a long list of features, such as: selection of nearby peers, redundant storage, efficient search/location of data items, data permanence or guarantees, hierarchical naming, trust and authentication, and anonymity. P2P networks potentially offer an efficient routing architecture that is self-organizing, massively scalable, and robust in the wide-area, combining fault tolerance, load balancing, and explicit notion of locality. In this article we present a survey and comparison of various Structured and Unstructured P2P overlay networks. We categorize the various schemes into these two groups in the design spectrum, and discuss the application-level network performance of each group.

引用

页码：72 / 93

页数：22

共 112 条

[91] Rhea S., 2001, IEEE INTERNET COMP
[92] Rowstron A., 2001, Operating Systems Review, V35, P188, DOI 10.1145/502059.502053
[93] Rowstron A., 2001, Networked Group Communication. Third International COST264 Workshop, NGC 2001. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol.2233), P30
[94] Rowstron A., 2001, P MIDDL
[95] Saroiu S., 2002, P MULT COMP NET MMCN
[96] Shavitt Y., 2003, P IEEE INFOCOM 2003
[97] Shavitt Y., 2004, P IEEE INFOCOM 2004
[98] SIEGEL HJ, 1979, COMPUTER, V12, P57, DOI 10.1109/MC.1979.1658780
[99] Singh A., 2004, P SIGOPS EUR WKSP LE
[100] Singla Anurag., Ultrapeers: Another Step Towards Gnutella Scalability

← 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 →