Prophylactic antibiotic treatment in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis:: A placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

被引:307
作者
Isenmann, R
Rünzi, M
Kron, M
Kahl, S
Kraus, D
Jung, N
Maier, L
Malfertheiner, P
Goebell, H
Beger, HG
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Gen Surg, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Dept Abdominal & Transplantat Surg, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[3] Kliniken Essen Sued, Dept Gastroenterol, Essen, Germany
[4] Univ Ulm, Dept Biometry & Med Documentat, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[5] Univ Magdeburg, Dept Gastroenterol, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[6] Univ Nuremberg, Dept Gen Surg, Nurnberg, Germany
[7] Klin Heidenheim, Dept Internal Med, Heidenheim, Germany
[8] Univ Ulm, Dept Pharmaceut, Ulm, Germany
[9] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Gastroenterol, Essen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.050
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Antibiotic prophylaxis in necrotizing pancreatitis remains controversial. Until now, there have been no double-blind studies dealing with this topic. Methods: A total sample size of 200 patients was calculated to demonstrate with a power of 90% that antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the proportion of patients with infected pancreatic necrosis from 40% placebo (PLA) to 20% ciprofloxacin/metronidazole (CIP/MET). One hundred fourteen patients with acute pancreatitis in combination with a serum C-reactive protein exceeding 150 mg/L and/or necrosis on contrast-enhanced CT scan were enrolled and received either intravenous CIP (2 x 400 mg/day) + MET (2 x 500 mg/day) or PLA. Study medication was discontinued and switched to open antibiotic treatment when infectious complications, multiple organ failure sepsis, or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) occurred. After half of the planned sample size was recruited, an adaptive interim analysis was performed, and recruitment was stopped. Results: Fifty-eight patients received CIP/MET and 56 patients PLA. Twenty-eight percent in the CIP/MET group required open antibiotic treatment vs. 46% with PLA. Twelve percent of the CIP/MET group developed infected pancreatic necrosis compared with 9% of the PLA group (P = 0.585). Mortality was 5% in the CIP/MET and 7% in the PLA group. In 76 patients with pancreatic necrosis on contrast-enhanced CT scan, no differences in the rate of infected pancreatic necrosis, systemic complications, or mortality were observed. Conclusions: This study detected no benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis with respect to the risk of developing infected pancreatic necrosis.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1004
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] *AM COLL CHEST PHY, 1992, CRIT CARE MED, V220, P864
  • [2] ANDRENSANDBERG A, 2002, J PANCREAS, V3, P116
  • [3] ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - VALUE OF CT IN ESTABLISHING PROGNOSIS
    BALTHAZAR, EJ
    ROBINSON, DL
    MEGIBOW, AJ
    RANSON, JHC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (02) : 331 - 336
  • [4] Banks PA, 1997, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V92, P377
  • [5] Current concepts - Acute necrotizing pancreatitis
    Baron, TH
    Morgan, DE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (18) : 1412 - 1417
  • [6] Controlled clinical trial of pefloxacin versus imipenem in severe acute pancreatitis
    Bassi, C
    Falconi, M
    Talamini, G
    Uomo, G
    Papaccio, G
    Dervenis, C
    Salvia, R
    Minelli, EB
    Pederzoli, P
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 115 (06) : 1513 - 1517
  • [7] EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTS WITH ADAPTIVE INTERIM ANALYSES
    BAUER, P
    KOHNE, K
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) : 1029 - 1041
  • [8] BACTERIAL-CONTAMINATION OF PANCREATIC NECROSIS - A PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL-STUDY
    BEGER, HG
    BITTNER, R
    BLOCK, S
    BUCHLER, M
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 91 (02) : 433 - 438
  • [9] Surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis
    Beger, HG
    Isenmann, R
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 79 (04) : 783 - +
  • [10] BRADLEY EL, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P586