Controlled clinical trial of pefloxacin versus imipenem in severe acute pancreatitis

被引:140
作者
Bassi, C
Falconi, M
Talamini, G
Uomo, G
Papaccio, G
Dervenis, C
Salvia, R
Minelli, EB
Pederzoli, P
机构
[1] Borgo Roma Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Verona, Italy
[2] Borgo Roma Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Verona, Italy
[3] Borgo Roma Univ Hosp, Dept Pharmacol, Verona, Italy
[4] Cardarelli Hosp, Pancreat Dis Ctr, Naples, Italy
[5] Umberto Hosp 1, Div Surg 1, Venice, Italy
[6] Agia Holga Hosp, Dept Surg, Athens, Greece
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70030-7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Antibiotic prophylaxis in severe pancreatitis has recently yielded promising clinical results, with imipenem significantly reducing the incidence of infected necrosis compared with an untreated control group. On the bases of pefloxacin's spectrum of action and pancreatic penetration, we investigated whether such drugs represent a valid alternative to imipenem, Methods: In a multicenter study, 60 patients with severe acute pancreatitis with necrosis affecting at least 50% of the pancreas were randomly allocated to receive intravenous treatment for 2 weeks with pefloxacin, 400 mg twice daily (30 patients), or imipenem, 500 mg three times daily (30 patients), within 120 hours of onset of symptoms. Age, sex, body weight, Ranson and Apache II scores, C-reactive protein, etiology, and time from onset of symptoms to treatment were well matched in the two groups. Results: The incidences of infected necrosis and extrapancreatic infections were 34% and 44%, respectively, in the pefloxacin group and 10% and 20% in the imipenem group. Imipenem proved significantly more effective in prevention of pancreatic infections (P less than or equal to 0.05), Mortality was not significantly different in the two groups. Conclusions: Despite its theoretical potential, pefloxacin is inferior to imipenem in the prevention of infections associated with severe pancreatitis.
引用
收藏
页码:1513 / 1517
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], SURG RES COMMUN
  • [2] Banks PA, 1995, INT J PANCREATOL, V18, P265
  • [3] Barie P., 1996, AM J SURG, V172, P38
  • [4] BASSI C, 1994, INT J PANCREATOL, V16, P1
  • [5] BEHAVIOR OF ANTIBIOTICS DURING HUMAN NECROTIZING PANCREATITIS
    BASSI, C
    PEDERZOLI, P
    VESENTINI, S
    FALCONI, M
    BONORA, A
    ABBAS, H
    BENINI, A
    BERTAZZONI, EM
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1994, 38 (04) : 830 - 836
  • [6] BASSI C, 1997, PROBL GEN SURG, V13, P80
  • [7] Why sepsis trials fail
    Bone, RC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (07): : 565 - 566
  • [8] ANTIBIOTICS IN ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS
    BRADLEY, EL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1989, 158 (05) : 472 - 477
  • [9] PENETRATION OF CIPROFLOXACIN AND OFLOXACIN INTO HUMAN ALLOGRAFT PANCREATIC-JUICE
    BRATTSTROM, C
    MALMBORG, AS
    TYDEN, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1988, 22 (02) : 213 - 219
  • [10] BUCHLER M, 1992, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V103, P1902