Intermediaries for open innovation: A competence-based comparison of knowledge transfer offices practices

被引:97
作者
Alexander, Allen T. [2 ]
Martin, Dominique Philippe [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes 1, CREM UMR CNRS 6211, IGR IAE, F-35708 Rennes 7, France
[2] Univ Exeter, Sch Business, Ctr Innovat & Serv Res, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Univ Rennes 1, Grad Sch Business & Adm, F-35708 Rennes 7, France
关键词
Transfer office; Knowledge; Technology transfer; Channels of transfer; Core competences; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER OFFICES; UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY; SOCIAL-STRUCTURE; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; TRUST; COMMERCIALIZATION; COMMUNITIES; PERSPECTIVE; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Universities and Public Research Organisation rely on the capabilities and competences of their transfer offices to engage with commercial partners and to manage the exchange of knowledge and expertise. This paper promotes a model that can be used to analyse the capabilities and relative strategies of these transfer offices. Based on a 'core competences' approach the model enables the precise characterisation of the different modes and methods of transfer and engagement. Findings, coming from a two-year, in-depth comparative study of two transfer offices located in France and in the UK, underline the office's relative positioning within their institutional environment and identify the relative priority given to their use of the channels of transfer. These results provide a guide for the strategic management of transfer offices that are now operating within an 'open innovation' paradigm. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 49
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
[41]   Contract law and the governance of inter-firm technology partnerships - An analysis of different modes of partnering and their contractual implications [J].
Hagedoorn, John ;
Hesen, Geerte .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2007, 44 (03) :342-366
[42]   COMPETITION FOR COMPETENCE AND INTER-PARTNER LEARNING WITHIN INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC ALLIANCES [J].
HAMEL, G .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1991, 12 :83-103
[43]  
Holi M., 2007, ANAL UK U TECHNOLOGY, P1
[44]   Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation [J].
Howells, Jeremy .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (05) :715-728
[45]  
Hughes A., 2010, ESRC SOC NOW, P7
[46]   Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives [J].
Huizingh, Eelko K. R. E. .
TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (01) :2-9
[47]  
Iansiti M, 2004, HARVARD BUS REV, V82, P68
[48]   Technology transfer offices as institutional entrepreneurs: the case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and human embryonic stem cells [J].
Jain, Sanjay ;
George, Gerard .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2007, 16 (04) :535-567
[49]   INNOVATION AND COOPERATION - IMPLICATIONS FOR COMPETITION AND ANTITRUST [J].
JORDE, TM ;
TEECE, DJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1990, 4 (03) :75-96
[50]  
Kogut B, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P405, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<405::AID-SMJ103>3.0.CO