Differences in responses to iron deficiency between two legumes:: lentil (Lens culinaris) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

被引:26
作者
Mahmoudi, H
Ksouri, R
Gharsalli, M
Lachaâl, M
机构
[1] INRST, Lab Adaptat Plantes Stress Abiot, Hammam Lif 2050, Tunisia
[2] FST, Dept Biol, Tunis 1060, Tunisia
关键词
iron deficiency; lentil; chickpea; photosynthetic production; acidification; seed Fe content;
D O I
10.1016/j.jplph.2004.12.009
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Two legumes, lentil and chickpea, were cultivated in nutrient solutions: Fe lacking or containing 30 mu M Fe. After 12 days of Fe starvation, lentil showed a severe yellowing of young leaves, a large decrease in chlorophyll concentration and a significant decline of plant biomass. Chickpea showed a better response than a stronger acidification capacity. In addition, no chlorosis symptoms were observed in chickpea until the end of treatment. There was no significant difference in potassium uptake between the two species, but an enrichment of the young leaves at the expense of the old ones was noted in chickpea, and at a Lesser extent, in Lentil, when they were exposed to Fe deficiency. Moreover, this constraint led to a significant decrease of iron content in the two legumes. However, chickpea displayed higher accumulation levels of HCl-extractible iron in young and old leaves than did lentil. This protection of young leaves against K+ and Fe2+ impoverishment confers to these organs the capacity to preserve their chlorophyll status and their photosynthetic integrity. Furthermore, the better performance of chickpea under conditions of tow Fe availability could be partially related to its seed iron reserves, higher than those of lentil. (C) 2005 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1237 / 1245
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[11]  
Kosegarten H, 2001, J PLANT NUTR SOIL SC, V164, P155, DOI 10.1002/1522-2624(200104)164:2<155::AID-JPLN155>3.0.CO
[12]  
2-F
[13]   Differences in response to iron deficiency among some lines of common bean [J].
Krouma, A ;
Gharsalli, M ;
Abdelly, C .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2003, 26 (10-11) :2295-2305
[14]  
Ksouri K, 2004, VITIS, V43, P97
[15]  
LLORENTE S, 1976, AGROCHIMICA, V20, P204
[16]   Fe chelates for remediation of Fe chlorosis in strategy I plants [J].
Lucena, JJ .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2003, 26 (10-11) :1969-1984
[17]   STRATEGIES OF PLANTS FOR ACQUISITION OF IRON [J].
MARSCHNER, H ;
ROMHELD, V .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1994, 165 (02) :261-274
[18]  
MEHROTRA S C, 1991, Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy Part B Biological Sciences, V57, P287
[19]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEAF APOPLAST PH AND IRON CHLOROSIS OF SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS-ANNUUS L) [J].
MENGEL, K ;
PLANKER, R ;
HOFFMANN, B .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1994, 17 (06) :1053-1065
[20]   IRON REDUCTASE SYSTEMS ON THE PLANT PLASMA-MEMBRANE - A REVIEW [J].
MOOG, PR ;
BRUGGEMANN, W .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1994, 165 (02) :241-260