Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process

被引:151
作者
Aras, H [1 ]
Erdogmus, S
Koç, E
机构
[1] Osmangazi Univ, Engn & Architecture Fac, Dept Mech Engn, TR-26480 Bati Meselik, Eskisehir, Turkey
[2] Osmangazi Univ, Sci & Art Fac, Dept Stat, TR-26480 Bati Meselik, Eskisehir, Turkey
关键词
wind-speed observation station; AHP; location selection;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2003.12.020
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Projecting wind-power plants depends on the amount of the power that the plant can support. The location chosen for the project needs to be evaluated in consideration of different criteria when determining the potentiality of the wind-power. Measuring the wind-speed and the wind-path through equipment in prospective wind observation station play an important role in such later stages as evaluation of data, determination of the amount of energy and choosing the wind tribune. In this study, the aim was to determine the most convenient location for a wind observation station to be built on the campus of a university using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1383 / 1392
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Multi-criteria selection of electric power plants using analytical hierarchy process [J].
Akash, BA ;
Mamlook, R ;
Mohsen, MS .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1999, 52 (01) :29-35
[2]   Application of the analytic hierarchy process in agriculture in developing countries [J].
Alphonce, CB .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1997, 53 (01) :97-112
[3]   Wind energy status and its assessment in Turkey [J].
Aras, H .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2003, 28 (14) :2213-2220
[4]   Policy development for solar water heaters: the case of Lebanon [J].
Chedid, RB .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 43 (01) :77-86
[5]   Local preferences for economic development outcomes: Analytical hierarchy procedure [J].
Cox, AM ;
Alwang, J ;
Johnson, TG .
GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2000, 31 (03) :341-366
[6]  
FREI FX, 1998, MEASURING AGGREGATE, V7, P1
[7]  
Jaber JO, 2001, DESALINATION, V136, P83
[8]   Methodology and evaluation of priorities for energy and environmental research projects [J].
Kagazyo, T ;
Kaneko, K ;
Akai, M ;
Hijikata, K .
ENERGY, 1997, 22 (2-3) :121-129
[9]   Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach [J].
Karsak, EE ;
Sozer, S ;
Alptekin, SE .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 44 (01) :171-190
[10]   Selection of an optimal nuclear fuel cycle scenario by goal programming and the analytic hierarchy process [J].
Kim, PO ;
Lee, KJ ;
Lee, BW .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 1999, 26 (05) :449-460