Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration

被引:362
作者
Nicolini, Davide [1 ]
Mengis, Jeanne [1 ,2 ]
Swan, Jacky [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, IKON, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Lugano, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
cross-disciplinary collaboration; epistemic object; boundary object; activity theory; practice-based studies; infrastructure; boundaries; artifacts; ethnography; BOUNDARY OBJECTS; KNOWLEDGE; TECHNOLOGY; DESIGN; TRANSFORMATION; COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATIONS; COMMUNITIES; INNOVATION; LIFE;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1110.0664
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this paper we make a case for the use of multiple theoretical perspectives theory on boundary objects, epistemic objects, cultural historical activity theory, and objects as infrastructure to understand the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. A pluralist approach highlights that objects perform at least three types of work in this context: they motivate collaboration, they allow participants to work across different types of boundaries, and they constitute the fundamental infrastructure of the activity. Building on the results of an empirical study, we illustrate the insights that each theoretical lens affords into practices of collaboration and develop a novel analytical framework that organizes objects according to the active work they perform. Our framework can help shed new light on the phenomenon, especially with regard to the shifting status of objects and sources of conflict (and change) in collaboration. After discussing these novel insights, we outline directions for future research stemming from a pluralist approach. We conclude by noting the managerial implications of our findings.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 629
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Alvesson M., 1996, COMMUNICATION POWER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, HUMAN MACHINE RECONF
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INTERPRETIVE RES DES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, EPISTEMIC CULTURES S, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674039681
[5]  
Bartel C.A., 2003, The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management, P324
[6]   Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor [J].
Bechky, BA .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (03) :312-330
[7]   Talking about Machines, thick description, and knowledge work [J].
Bechky, Beth A. .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2006, 27 (12) :1757-1768
[8]   PERSPECTIVE MAKING AND PERSPECTIVE-TAKING IN COMMUNITIES OF KNOWING [J].
BOLAND, RJ ;
TENKASI, RV .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1995, 6 (04) :350-372
[9]   Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (05) :555-568
[10]   A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (04) :442-455