Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration

被引:362
作者
Nicolini, Davide [1 ]
Mengis, Jeanne [1 ,2 ]
Swan, Jacky [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, IKON, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Lugano, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
cross-disciplinary collaboration; epistemic object; boundary object; activity theory; practice-based studies; infrastructure; boundaries; artifacts; ethnography; BOUNDARY OBJECTS; KNOWLEDGE; TECHNOLOGY; DESIGN; TRANSFORMATION; COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATIONS; COMMUNITIES; INNOVATION; LIFE;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1110.0664
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this paper we make a case for the use of multiple theoretical perspectives theory on boundary objects, epistemic objects, cultural historical activity theory, and objects as infrastructure to understand the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. A pluralist approach highlights that objects perform at least three types of work in this context: they motivate collaboration, they allow participants to work across different types of boundaries, and they constitute the fundamental infrastructure of the activity. Building on the results of an empirical study, we illustrate the insights that each theoretical lens affords into practices of collaboration and develop a novel analytical framework that organizes objects according to the active work they perform. Our framework can help shed new light on the phenomenon, especially with regard to the shifting status of objects and sources of conflict (and change) in collaboration. After discussing these novel insights, we outline directions for future research stemming from a pluralist approach. We conclude by noting the managerial implications of our findings.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 629
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[51]   INSTITUTIONAL ECOLOGY, TRANSLATIONS AND BOUNDARY OBJECTS - AMATEURS AND PROFESSIONALS IN BERKELEYS-MUSEUM-OF-VERTEBRATE-ZOOLOGY, 1907-39 [J].
STAR, SL ;
GRIESEMER, JR .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 1989, 19 (03) :387-420
[52]   This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept [J].
Star, Susan Leigh .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2010, 35 (05) :601-617
[53]  
Strauss A.L., 1993, Continual permutations of action
[54]   The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation [J].
Swan, Jacky ;
Bresnen, Mike ;
Newell, Sue ;
Robertson, Maxine .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2007, 60 (12) :1809-1837
[55]   Commentary on Wanda Orlikowski's 'Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability' [J].
Swan, Jacky .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2006, 15 (05) :467-469
[56]   Finding the organization in the communication: Discourse as action and sensemaking [J].
Taylor, JR ;
Robichaud, D .
ORGANIZATION, 2004, 11 (03) :395-413
[57]   SOME SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE LONGWALL METHOD OF COAL-GETTING [J].
Trist, E. L. ;
Bamforth, K. W. .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1951, 4 (01) :3-38
[58]   BACK ON THE NOTION OF SUBJECT-BORDER PASCALE TRUMPET AND DOMINIQUE VINCK [J].
Trompette, Pascale ;
Vinck, Dominique .
REVUE D ANTHROPOLOGIE DES CONNAISSANCES, 2009, 3 (01) :5-27
[59]  
Wartofsky M. W., 1979, Models: Representation and the scientific understanding
[60]  
Wenger E, 1998, CONUNUNITIES PRACTIC