Physico-chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals

被引:1487
作者
Kurniawan, TA
Chan, GYS [1 ]
Lo, WH
Babel, S
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Appl Biol & Chem Technol, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, State Key Lab Chinese Med & Mol Pharmacol, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Thammasat Univ, SIIT, Environm Technol Program, Pathum Thani 12121, Thailand
关键词
electroplating industry; heavy metal uptake; inorganic effluent; metal-contaminated water; water pollution control;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2006.01.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article reviews the technical applicability of various physico-chemical treatments for the removal of heavy metals such as Cd(II). Cr(III), Cr(VI), Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) from contaminated wastewater. A particular focus is given to chemical precipitation, coagulation-flocculation, flotation, ion exchange and membrane filtration. Their advantages and limitations in application are evaluated. Their operating conditions such as pH, dose required, initial metal concentration and treatment performance are presented. About 124 published studies (1980-2006) are reviewed. It is evident from the survey that ion exchange and membrane filtration are the most frequently studied and widely applied for the treatment of metal-containinated wastewater. Ion exchange has achieved a complete removal of Cd(II), Cr(III), Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) with an initial concentration of 100 mg/L, respectively. The results are comparable to that of reverse osmosis (99% of Cd(II) rejection with an initial concentration of 200 mg/L). Lime precipitation has been found as one of the most effective means to treat inorganic effluent with a metal concentration of higher than 1000 mg/L. It is important to note that the overall treatment cost of metal-contaminated water varies, depending on the process employed and the local conditions. In general, the technical applicability, plant simplicity and cost-effectiveness are the key factors in selecting the most suitable treatment for inorganic effluent. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 98
页数:16
相关论文
共 126 条
[1]   The removal of cadmium and lead from aqueous solution by ion exchange with Na-Y zeolite [J].
Ahmed, S ;
Chughtai, S ;
Keane, MA .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 13 (01) :57-64
[2]   Removal of ions in nickel electroplating rinse water using low-pressure nanofiltration [J].
Ahn, KH ;
Song, KG ;
Cha, HY ;
Yeom, IT .
DESALINATION, 1999, 122 (01) :77-84
[3]   Adsorption studies on Citrus reticulata (fruit peel of orange):: removal and recovery of Ni(II) from electroplating wastewater [J].
Ajmal, M ;
Rao, RAK ;
Ahmad, R ;
Ahmad, J .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2000, 79 (1-2) :117-131
[4]   Separation of Co(II)/Ni(II) via micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using organophosphorus acid extractant solubilized by nonionic surfactant [J].
Akita, S ;
Castillo, LP ;
Nii, S ;
Takahashi, K ;
Takeuchi, H .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1999, 162 (1-2) :111-117
[5]  
Ali AAH, 1997, J CHEM TECHNOL BIOT, V69, P27, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199705)69:1<27::AID-JCTB682>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-A
[7]   Removal of chromium from aqueous solution by complexation - Ultrafiltration using a water-soluble macroligand [J].
Aliane, A ;
Bounatiro, N ;
Cherif, AT ;
Akretche, DE .
WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (09) :2320-2326
[8]   Purification of metal electroplating waste waters using zeolites [J].
Alvarez-Ayuso, E ;
García-Sánchez, A ;
Querol, X .
WATER RESEARCH, 2003, 37 (20) :4855-4862
[9]   Membrane bioreactors vs conventional biological treatment of landfill leachate: a brief review [J].
Alvarez-Vazquez, H ;
Jefferson, B ;
Judd, SJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 79 (10) :1043-1049
[10]  
Andrus ME., 2000, MET FINISH, V98, P20, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0026-0576(00)83532-1