Species-specific identification of commercial probiotic strains

被引:96
作者
Yeung, PSM
Sanders, ME [1 ]
Kitts, CL
Cano, R
Tong, PS
机构
[1] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Dairy Prod Technol Ctr, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
[2] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Environm Biotechnol Inst, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
关键词
probiotics; Lactobacillus acidophilus; Lactobacillus casei;
D O I
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74164-7
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Products containing probiotic bacteria are gaining popularity, increasing the importance of their accurate speciation. Unfortunately, studies have suggested that improper labeling of probiotic species is common in commercial products. Species identification of a bank of commercial probiotic strains was attempted using partial 16S rDNA sequencing, carbohydrate fermentation analysis, and cellular fatty acid methyl ester analysis. Results from partial 16S rDNA sequencing indicated discrepancies between species designations for 26 out of 58 strains tested, including two ATCC Lactobaciffits strains. When considering only the commercial strains obtained directly from the manufacturers, 14 of 29 strains carried species designations different from those obtained by partial 16S rDNA sequencing. Strains from six commercial products were species not listed on the label. The discrepancies mainly occurred in Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei groups. Carbohydrate fermentation analysis was not sensitive enough to identify species within the L. acidophilus group. Fatty acid methyl ester analysis was found to be variable and inaccurate and is not recommended to identify probiotic lactobacilli.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1051
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ALMINEN S, 1998, MICROBIAL ECOL HLTH, V10, P68
[2]   Bifidobacterium lactis Meile et al. 1997 is a subjective synonym of Bifidobacterium animalis (Mitsuoka 1969) Scardovi and Trovatelli 1974 [J].
Cai, YM ;
Matsumoto, M ;
Benno, Y .
MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 44 (10) :815-820
[3]  
Canganella F, 1997, MICROBIOL RES, V152, P171
[4]   HETEROGENEITY OF BILE-SALTS RESISTANCE IN THE LACTOBACILLUS ISOLATES OF A PROBIOTIC CONSORTIUM [J].
CHATEAU, N ;
DESCHAMPS, AM ;
SASSI, AH .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 18 (01) :42-44
[5]   DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC-ACID HOMOLOGY STUDIES OF LACTOBACILLUS-CASEI, LACTOBACILLUS-PARACASEI SP-NOV, SUBSP PARACASEI AND SUBSP TOLERANS, AND LACTOBACILLUS-RHAMNOSUS SP-NOV, COMB-NOV [J].
COLLINS, MD ;
PHILLIPS, BA ;
ZANONI, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC BACTERIOLOGY, 1989, 39 (02) :105-108
[6]   DESIGNATION OF ATCC 334 IN PLACE OF ATCC 393 (NCDO 161) AS THE NEOTYPE STRAIN OF LACTOBACILLUS-CASEI SUBSP. CASEI AND REJECTION OF THE NAME LACTOBACILLUS-PARACASEI [J].
DELLAGLIO, F ;
DICKS, LMT ;
DUTOIT, M ;
TORRIANI, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC BACTERIOLOGY, 1991, 41 (02) :340-342
[7]   Reclassification of Lactobacillus casei subsp casei ATCC 393 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 15820 as Lactobacillus zeae nom rev, designation of ATCC 334 as the neotype of L-casei subsp casei, and rejection of the Lactobacillus paracasei [J].
Dicks, LMT ;
DuPlessis, EM ;
Dellaglio, F ;
Lauer, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC BACTERIOLOGY, 1996, 46 (01) :337-340
[8]  
Felsenstein J., 1989, CLADISTICS, V5, P164, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1096-0031.1989.TB00562.X
[9]   CELLULAR FATTY-ACIDS ANALYSIS IN THE IDENTIFICATION OF LACTIC-ACID BACTERIA [J].
GILAROVA, R ;
VOLDRICH, M ;
DEMNEROVA, K ;
CEROVSKY, M ;
DOBIAS, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 24 (1-2) :315-319
[10]   Note:: Identification of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subspecies bulgaricus and subspecies lactis dairy isolates by amplified rDNA restriction analysis [J].
Giraffa, G ;
De Vecchi, P ;
Rossetti, L .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 85 (05) :918-924